Re: Ambient temperature control

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Ambient temperature control
De : legg (at) *nospam* nospam.magma.ca (legg)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 01. Jul 2024, 15:34:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <k4f58j1r7hr7is2eq1rb4tspurt4ive8fe@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:14:32 -0700, Don Y
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

Assuming you can keep a device in its "normal operating (temperature)
range", how advantageous is it (think MTBF) to drive that ambient
down?  And, is there a sweet spot (as there is a cost to lowering the
temperature)?
>
If all you're thinking of is MTBF, adding the complexity of an active
cooling element is a big step in the wrong direction for the system.

Reducing the thermal impedance of the source, to ambient is the
usual way to go, when addressing a specific aging factor.

https://ve3ute.ca/2000a.html

If you're thinking of performance, It's cheaper and more reliable
to concentrate on reducing the temperature of the point source, not
the rest of the planet.

RL

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal