Re: OT: More Nails in the Global Warming Scam's Coffin

On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:07:28 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 3/23/2024 7:53 PM, john larkin wrote:

On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 18:00:53 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
 

On 3/23/2024 5:23 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:43:15 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>

john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:14:18 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>

Awareness of the Climate Change scam continues to spread - at an
ever-increasing rate. As more and more people reject this preposterous
notion, only the most die-hard Marxists will stick with it - and be
shown up for what they are.
>
https://tinyurl.com/e9wkbz8x

>
Most people are bored with it already, and politicians are getting the
message, and don't want to be blamed for unrelible, expensive
electricity and for job losses.

>
Unfortunately for many politicians, they have pubilcly proclaimed their
support for the scams and mirages of the 'activists' and even laid out
timetables for *when* they are going to achieve them, though not*how*
they are going to achieve them.
>

>
Electric car sales seem to have peaked.

>
In the news bulletin on Radio Romania International a couple of nights
ago they proudly proclaimed that sales of electric cars in Romania had
reached 12,000 last year.  A little leter the mentioned that the Ford
factory was turning out 1,000 engines per day.  I assume they know the
difference between 'engines' (petrol or diesel) and electric motors, so
it looks as though electric car production is absolutely miniscule by
comparison.

>
Long may it remain so. Almost all the early adopters of EV production
were the well-in crowd who knew they were going to benefit hugely from
all the subsidies they would enjoy at taxpayers' expense. Seeing them
take a bath on their investment would warm the cockles of my heart no
end.

>
Meanwhile, cranky wingnut "I don't believe in dat climate change stuff!"
owners of beachfront property (naturally!) want the state/taxpayer to
pitch in to save their property from the rising sea:

 
2 mm per year! Panic!
 

>
The sea seems to be coming in their front doors regardless, it seems
immune to right-wing talking points! Have they tried shouting at it?

When you build a house on a beach in hurricane territory, it helps to
have cheap federal flood insurance.

Some really bad floods were the great Galveston storm of 1900 and the
giant nor-easter in New England in 1938. Both in September.

https://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/articles/deadliest-us-hurricanes

I remember being in the eye of Betsy, and drove through Gulfport soon
after Camille.

Storms are less deadly now because we have satellite warnings.