Re: Too much time on their hands!

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:42:37 +0000, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

On 18/03/2025 15:03, john larkin wrote:

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:08:32 +0000, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
 

Unless you do a lot of video editing or 3D rendering the GPU built into
the modern Intel chips is entirely adequate for 2D business graphics.

 
I wish they would help with Spice. Yesterday we were running a pretty
simple power supply sim at around 100 us/s. It takes many minutes to
settle out, and it's hard to learn with such delayed feedback.

>
Have you tried running two instances of Spice at the same time?
>
On a suitably beefy machine with plenty of ram it might be possible to
run two different sets of parameters at the same time on the performance
cores without saturating memory or disk IO bandwidth.
>
It will depend critically on how big the matrix problem gets but for
some smaller problems it might possibly be an option.

Two instances would be confusing. One use of Spice is to train one's
instincts and iterate a design.

At times yesterday, the power supply sim was running at picoseconds
per second. LT Spice allows one to set the max time step, but not the
minimum time step.

The Gear solver and some relaxed tolerances seem to be better for this
case.

In one recent case the sim kept stalling. I added a 1K resistor off to
the side, one end grounded and the other end connected to nothing.
That fixed things.

Inductors, especially coupled inductors, are quirky. A little ESR
often helps, but that may be random, like the 1K resistor.

I wonder if just moving parts around the screen affects the sim. Gotta
try that.

I think LT Spice was once called Switchercad. But it's terrible with
switchers.