Re: Cascading UPSs

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Cascading UPSs
De : sylvia (at) *nospam* email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 07. Jan 2025, 12:27:12
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lu4hcgFt8nhU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
On 07-Jan-25 5:22 am, Don Y wrote:
I've a shitload of UPSs -- most in the office.
 Power *tends* to be pretty reliable, here, so they aren't
used for their "backup" capability.  However, we do tend to
see "switching transients", predictably, at certain times
of the day.  So, having a "second" of carryover is often
helpful (on the smaller machines; the larger ones have big
enough power supplies that they can bridge these momentary
outages)
 Instead, they tend to be "outlet multipliers" in much the
same way as outlet strips might be (though a better form
factor, given the layout of my kit).  They let me connect
all of the devices for a host to the UPS associated with that
host.  Then, power them all on/off at the same time.
 But, most importantly, it lets me get a feel for how much
of a load I have on the mains -- so I don't carelessly
add some new load that blows a breaker!
 Replacing batteries is a costly -- and time consuming -- exercise.
A single "shared" battery would be the preferred solution.  But,
not possible with COTS UPSs (nor the associated IR drops).
 OTOH,  I *could* plug more than one UPS into a single (or few)
"master" UPS that effectively takes on the role of the mains
connection.  Then, I just have to keep that/those UPS running
("properly") to gain the benefits of bridging those brief glitches.
 Any downsides to this?  If I remove the batteries from the
"slave" UPSs (i.e., don't replace them when they fail), then
I can avoid that maintenance issue but still retain the other
advantages of the UPS-per-workstation.
 Or, maybe put some trivial "power source" in their place that
is just enough to satisfy the UPSs' expectations of a "battery"?
 [I'd still have to put up with the "connect battery" messages
but maybe I'll hack the firmware to "fix" that issue -- and,
stop the silly scrolling of "screens" so I can just see the
data of interest, constantly.]
 [[UPS manufacturers seem to have shitty/buggy/unfriendly software]]
 
Some UPS designs cannot be turned on[*] without a battery in them, even when supplied with mains power, because they cannot energise the relay that enables the mains connection.
Sylvia.
[*] They can stay on, just not be turned on.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Jan 25 * Cascading UPSs12Don Y
7 Jan 25 +* Re: Cascading UPSs9Sylvia Else
7 Jan 25 i+* Re: Cascading UPSs7Don Y
8 Jan 25 ii`* Re: Cascading UPSs6Sylvia Else
8 Jan 25 ii `* Re: Cascading UPSs5Don Y
10 Jan 25 ii  +- Re: Cascading UPSs1Don Y
10 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: Cascading UPSs2Carlos E.R.
11 Jan 25 ii  i`- Re: Cascading UPSs1Don Y
10 Jan 25 ii  `- Re: Cascading UPSs1Carlos E.R.
10 Jan 25 i`- Re: Cascading UPSs1Don Y
7 Jan 25 `* Re: Cascading UPSs2Martin Rid
7 Jan 25  `- Re: Cascading UPSs1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal