Sujet : Re: inductor polarity
De : news (at) *nospam* analogconsultants.com (Joerg)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 28. Feb 2025, 06:24:23
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <m2cvk7FmujsU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
On 2/27/25 7:50 PM, john larkin wrote:
I need to put 16 of these on a very dense PC board.
https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/murata-power-solutions-inc/19R476C/5798223
Each of the eight channels needs two of these. If I can put each pair
of inductors close together and with the same current but opposed
field direction, I'll get minimum mag field leakage to other channels
(and to other boards.)
I see that one lead is longer than the other. I wonder if that implies
a consistent winding direction, so my manufacturing people could use
that as the "pin1" indicator.
Typically that is the case.
If that's not dependable, I'll have to set up a rig to determine mag
field polarity, and mark one side with a red dot or something.
Best is to shoot off an Email to Murata. They are usually quite responsive to technical inquiries. That one email could save your production folks a lot of future grunt work.
I'd rather use surface-mount shielded inductors, but these tall
unshielded drum cores have way more L and less R than a shielded part,
for a given PCB footprint.
But those also talk a lot :-)
-- Regards, Joerghttp://www.analogconsultants.com/