Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane
De : news (at) *nospam* analogconsultants.com (Joerg)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 10. Mar 2025, 23:26:55
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <m3979iFbusU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
On 3/10/25 2:55 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> wrote:
 
On 3/10/25 8:33 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
I've made a magnetic base for a quarter wave whip aerial; different
length rods can be screwed onto it for the 2-metre and 4-metre bands and
there is a sliding joint which allows a degree of length adjustment.
>
There are three ring magnets bolted to the underside of a 200mm diameter
steel plate with thin polythene discs, to protect the paintwork, between
the magnets and the roof of the van on which it will be used.  The total
thickness of the polythene discs, the ceramic magnets and their back
plates is enough to raise the underside of the steel plate about 11mm
above the roof of the van.
>
The braid of the co-ax feeder is soldered to a tag on the steel plate,
but of course this is not in direct contact with the metal of the van
roof which forms the 'infinite' ground plane.  The capacitance between
the steel plate and the van roof is about 120 pf, which has a reactance
of about 18 ohms at 72 Mc/s and half as much at 145 Mc/s.  To balance
the feed point I have inserted a 120pf capacitor between the centre
conductor of the co-ax and the connection to the rod elements.
>
Is this going to cause a shift in resonance that can be corrected by
adjusting the length of the elements (one of which is 'infinite' anyway)
or is it liable to upset everything.  if the latter, is there a solution
that doesn't involve butchering the van roof?
>
>
9ohms isn't much, 18ohms is. But yes, that extra 120pf in series with
the coax center will alter resonance which can be corrected by changing
the length of the whip.
 I've made it from an assortment of light alloy tubes and rods (the rods
were machined down between centres on a large lathe so they can slide
into the tubes).  There's quite a lot of adjustment but I wonder how
much that will affect the terminating impedance of the co-ax (it can be
tuned to be resistive but it may not not necessarily be 50 ohms).
 
I wouldn't worry too much about that. For example, I have an 80m/30m double dipole at the far end of the house. Easily 150ft of coax. Being the cheapskate I used leftover TV coax which in the US is 75ohms instead of the 50ohm I would really need. The SWR isn't stellar but still under 1.5 at resonance. Works fine.

 
I don't see any "non-invasive" solution, assuming you don't even want a
pointy contact screw into the metal because maybe the van is fairly new.
That would also rule out sanding down the thickness of the paint :-)
 It's not that new but it is 'tidy' and I would like to keep it that way.
It is also used as a 'stealth' camper, so the mounting has to be easily
removeable so as not to attract attention when parking up for the night.
 
Just affix an MI5 sticker on the rear bumper and nobody would dare come near your van :-)
There are also quick-release 90-degree "dropper mounts" that people use to drive tall vehicles into their garages without shearing off the antenna. Then the antenna would lay flat on the van's roof while down.

 
Another option might be to just live with the asymmetry and use a common
mode choke at the antenna to muffle the imbalance. That would have to be
secured against wind, of course, but at least you don't have German
autobahn speeds in the UK.
 My intention is to use it portable but not mobile.  The transciever I am
designing doesn't lend itself to mobile operation.
 
Wow, making your own 2m/4m rig? Hats off!

 
No chance to bolt to something conductive up there? I guess the roof
rack channels on most modern verhicles aren't conductive anymore.
 There are quite substantial roof bars made from galvanised steel tube
but they have pieces of rubber under the mounting clips, so they don't
puncture the paint and make metallic contact with the metalwork of the
van.  You can just see the rearmost bar in the picture of the exterior
cowl at:
 http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/Van/vanconversion.htm#COOKER
 I had wondered about a large sheet of very thin flexible alloy, which
could be retained by a further 4 magnets, to give much greater
capacitance - but there are two problems with that idea:
 1)  Stowing the sheet in the van would present problems.
 2)  For good 2-metre contacts the van needs to be parked on a hilltop
and hilltops tend to be windy.  Manipulating the sheet would be
difficult and it may not stay on the roof for very long.
 
Yeah, that would flop about wildly when it's windy. But looking at the rear doors I notice very sturdy hinges where the sections on the side of the van will have a solid chassis contact. That is where hams sometimes mount antennas over here, especially big HF antennas. Not only would you solve the grounding issue but you'd also have a solid mounting point without drilling into the vehicle.
For example, you could get another of those hinges from a vehicle junkyard, have someone weld a piece of steel to it and then mount the antenna on that. If you ever sell the van you could mount the hinge you took off.

 
One thing you might consider is to drill or machine three big holes into
the steel plate and sink the magnets into it so they are flush with the
bottom surface. That way the whole steel plate could make surface
contact with the roof (with a thin protective plastic layer in between,
of course). That should increase the capacitance substantially.
 That's an idea, I won't be able to do it with the existing plate, but I
do have a bigger piece that might work.  My lathe only has 9" radius
swing (with the bed gapped), so I might have to trepan the holes
instead.
 
Or maybe ask a friend who has a bigger lathe.
--
Regards, Joerg (AJ6QL)
http://www.analogconsultants.com/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Mar 25 * Quarter-wave whip earth plane27Liz Tuddenham
10 Mar 25 +* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane10Joerg
10 Mar 25 i`* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane9Liz Tuddenham
10 Mar 25 i +- Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane1Ralph Mowery
10 Mar 25 i `* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane7Joerg
11 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane6Liz Tuddenham
11 Mar 25 i   +- Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane1Joerg
15 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane4Liz Tuddenham
15 Mar 25 i    +- Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane1Jeroen Belleman
15 Mar 25 i    `* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane2Tauno Voipio
15 Mar 25 i     `- Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane1Liz Tuddenham
10 Mar 25 +* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane6legg
10 Mar 25 i+* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane3Joerg
11 Mar 25 ii`* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane2Liz Tuddenham
11 Mar 25 ii `- Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane1Joerg
11 Mar 25 i`* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane2Liz Tuddenham
11 Mar 25 i `- Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane1legg
11 Mar 25 +* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane9Joerg
11 Mar 25 i+* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane6Phil Hobbs
11 Mar 25 ii+* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane3Joerg
11 Mar 25 iii`* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane2Phil Hobbs
11 Mar 25 iii `- Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane1Joerg
11 Mar 25 ii`* Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane2john larkin
11 Mar 25 ii `- Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane1Phil Hobbs
11 Mar 25 i+- Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane1Liz Tuddenham
13 Mar 25 i`- Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane1Liz Tuddenham
15 Mar 25 `- Re: Quarter-wave whip earth plane1Liz Tuddenham

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal