Re: LT Spice looks

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: LT Spice looks
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 14. Nov 2024, 16:39:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <o96cjjp9n9v54l63f3uijke9mcu3setstp@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 15:30:32 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:54:02 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
 
Edward Rawde <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
[...]
 
If the netlist and PCB layout is correct then why waste time on making the
schematic look like you want it, only to be told by someone else that they
would have drawn it completely differently?
>
If you were a service engineer with the customer breathing down your
neck, which diagram would you prefer, 'A' or 'B' ?
>
http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/other/CircuitDiagrams.gif
 
They are both wrong.
>
Do you mean they wouldn't work or do you mean they aren't drawn to some
arbitrary standard?

Won't work. The batteries are backwards.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Nov 24 * LT Spice looks26john larkin
13 Nov 24 +* Re: LT Spice looks24legg
13 Nov 24 i`* Re: LT Spice looks23john larkin
13 Nov 24 i +* Re: LT Spice looks9john larkin
13 Nov 24 i i`* Re: LT Spice looks8Edward Rawde
13 Nov 24 i i `* Re: LT Spice looks7john larkin
13 Nov 24 i i  `* Re: LT Spice looks6Edward Rawde
13 Nov 24 i i   `* Re: LT Spice looks5john larkin
13 Nov 24 i i    `* Re: LT Spice looks4Edward Rawde
14 Nov 24 i i     `* Re: LT Spice looks3john larkin
14 Nov 24 i i      `* Re: LT Spice looks2Edward Rawde
14 Nov 24 i i       `- Re: LT Spice looks1john larkin
14 Nov 24 i `* Re: LT Spice looks13Liz Tuddenham
14 Nov 24 i  +- Re: LT Spice looks1Jan Panteltje
14 Nov 24 i  +* Re: LT Spice looks6john larkin
14 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: LT Spice looks5Liz Tuddenham
14 Nov 24 i  i `* Re: LT Spice looks4john larkin
14 Nov 24 i  i  `* Re: LT Spice looks3Liz Tuddenham
15 Nov 24 i  i   `* Re: LT Spice looks2john larkin
15 Nov 24 i  i    `- Re: LT Spice looks1Liz Tuddenham
14 Nov 24 i  `* Re: LT Spice looks5Edward Rawde
14 Nov 24 i   `* Re: LT Spice looks4Liz Tuddenham
14 Nov 24 i    `* Re: LT Spice looks3Edward Rawde
14 Nov 24 i     `* Re: LT Spice looks2Liz Tuddenham
14 Nov 24 i      `- Re: LT Spice looks1Edward Rawde
13 Nov 24 `- Re: LT Spice looks1Cursitor Doom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal