Sujet : Re: Intel
De : jjlarkin (at) *nospam* highlandtechnology.com (John Larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 05. Aug 2024, 16:26:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : highland technology
Message-ID : <oer1bj5qifv43gq4nn1cmaerc5l36ff56v@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
On Mon, 05 Aug 24 04:42:24 UTC, bitrex <
user@example.net> wrote:
On 8/3/2024 5:47 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 17:18:33 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 12:32:23 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
>
https://www.nextplatform.com/2024/08/02/the-resurrection-of-intel-will-take-more-than-three-days/?td=rt-3a
>
Looks like they wrecked Altera.
>
And hung onto the Intel '86 architecture a tad too tightly, for far
too long.
>
Joe Gwinn
Yes, it's an ancient dog. It's immensely complex to push the X86
architecture for speed, hence the power consumption and all the bugs.
>
This poor bugger:
>
<https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/1ehjuzj/i_bought_700k_worth_of_intel_stock_today/>
>
Since its peak in 2024, Intel stock has lost 2/3 of its value.