Sujet : Re: OT: Programming Languages
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 02. Nov 2024, 15:44:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <p5ecij1jf5a4in5mnmelkdfrovelr0esko@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 02 Nov 2024 07:44:28 GMT, Jan Panteltje <
alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 1 Nov 2024 22:50:41 -0000 (UTC)) it happened Nick Hayward
<nhayward8990@protonmail.com> wrote in <vg3m01$3e15j$2@dont-email.me>:
>
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 19:57:21 +0100, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
>
On 11/1/24 19:04, Cursitor Doom wrote:
You can call me old fashioned, but I still believe there's never been a
more elegant computer language than the original K&R C. You can keep
the rest; I'll stick with that.
Agreed! All the hand-holding of later versions just get in the way.
Jeroen Belleman
>
What about C++?
>
It is a crime against humanity!!!
Most computing languages originate from programmers wanting to play
with programming because solving real-world problems - the things we
pay them to do - isn't interesting.
In academia, they need toys and things to argue about so they keep
inventing languages. It's like economists who can't say "let the
market work, and econ 101 is all anybody needs."
I sat in on one cs class where new languages weren't enough fun, so
the prof lectured about compiler compilers, a whole new layer of
abstraction.