Re: really big physics

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: really big physics
De : jlArbor.com (at) *nospam* nirgendwo (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 04. Apr 2025, 16:49:49
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <rrvvuj90ru1bda05qrppd2jrokbjm6uc94@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 17:38:40 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

On 4/4/25 02:57, john larkin wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 23:42:15 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
 
On 4/3/25 20:04, john larkin wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 01:24:36 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 4/2/2025 1:02 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>
But the Reagan administration sure was a different time it's like the
right simply hasn't really known what to do with itself for 30 years,
until Trump showed up to give this cat-herding exercise a heavy dose of
identity politics to bond over.
>
Makes you sad.
>
The best thing for the West right now is a hefty dose of nationalistic
patriotism (but without the bellicose element which we can well do
without, of course). Globalism has impoverished us, and will continue
to do so until its proponents are crushed and sanity restored.
>
<https://x.com/AmichaiStein1/status/1907545520303714520>
>
25% tariff on vehicles and a 20% tariff on Israel, really putting
previous "left wing" administrations to shame in certain areas to be fair.
>
It's The Art of the Deal. Somebody wrote a book about that.
>
>
I can't imagine anyone making a deal with Trump now. He has amply
demonstrated to be utterly untrustworthy.
>
Jeroen Belleman
 
How so?
 
>
Oh, <shrug> nothing.
>
Jeroen Belleman

Exactly. Nothing.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Apr 25 * really big physics27john larkin
1 Apr 25 `* Re: really big physics26bitrex
1 Apr 25  `* Re: really big physics25john larkin
2 Apr 25   +- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
2 Apr 25   `* Re: really big physics23Cursitor Doom
2 Apr 25    +* Re: really big physics9john larkin
3 Apr 25    i+- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    i`* Re: really big physics7bitrex
3 Apr 25    i +* Re: really big physics4Liz Tuddenham
3 Apr 25    i i+* Re: really big physics2john larkin
3 Apr 25    i ii`- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    i i`- Re: really big physics1Phil Hobbs
3 Apr 25    i `* Re: really big physics2john larkin
3 Apr 25    i  `- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    `* Re: really big physics13bitrex
3 Apr 25     `* Re: really big physics12john larkin
3 Apr 25      +* Re: really big physics8Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i`* Re: really big physics7john larkin
4 Apr 25      i +- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25      i `* Re: really big physics5Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i  `* Re: really big physics4john larkin
4 Apr 25      i   `* Re: really big physics3Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i    `* Re: really big physics2john larkin
5 Apr 25      i     `- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25      +- Re: really big physics1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25      `* Re: really big physics2Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25       `- Re: really big physics1bitrex

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal