Re: Eclipse

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Eclipse
De : gtaylor (at) *nospam* tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 10. Apr 2024, 16:20:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : TNet Consulting
Message-ID : <uv677m$t1b$2@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/10/24 08:46, Martin Brown wrote:
The difference between 99% and totality is literally like between night and day
NASA said that my zip code was 99.1% and it was noticeably darker, much like heavy cloud cover from storms despite the clear sky. But it was still quite easy to drive or even read by < 1% of sunlight.
I've since read that it needs to be 99.9 ~> 100% to have significant impact on the amount of light.
I too have seen and enjoyed the light / shadow effects on the ground that others talked about.  I experienced thousands of tiny pinhole camera like from trees / bushes / even building awnings during the 2017 (?) eclipse.
--
Grant. . . .

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Apr 24 * Eclipse14Phil Hobbs
9 Apr 24 +* Re: Eclipse9Martin Rid
9 Apr 24 i`* Re: Eclipse8Martin Brown
9 Apr 24 i +* Re: Eclipse2Crash Gordon
10 Apr 24 i i`- Re: Eclipse1Martin Brown
10 Apr 24 i +* Re: Eclipse4bitrex
10 Apr 24 i i`* Re: Eclipse3Martin Brown
10 Apr 24 i i `* Re: Eclipse2Grant Taylor
10 Apr 24 i i  `- Re: Eclipse1Cursitor Doom
10 Apr 24 i `- Re: Eclipse1bitrex
9 Apr 24 +* Re: Eclipse3Wanderer
10 Apr 24 i`* Re: Eclipse2bitrex
10 Apr 24 i `- Re: Eclipse1Grant Taylor
12 Apr 24 `- Re: Eclipse1Tom Del Rosso

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal