Sujet : Re: IXTH76N25
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 01. Jun 2024, 17:54:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <v3fjne$2vp7$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"Don Y" <
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message
news:v3fh0o$2rnsc$1@dont-email.me...On 6/1/2024 8:20 AM, Edward Rawde wrote:
Go to download folder and open file with notepad++, note %PDF-1.5 which is not the most recent but shouldn't be an issue.
>
It's easy to CLAIM compliance with any version of a standard.
But, that likely doesn't mean it truly IS compliant.
It opens fine in Foxit and all pages are viewable with no corruption that I can see.
That's sufficient test for me.
>
I've got a 1.2 PDF, here, that opens fine in all of the above tools.
As do 1.3, 1.5 and 1.6.
>
Along with a 1.5 that I created (using Adobe tools).
I haven't touched Adobe tools for many years.
If I want to create a pdf myself then in the past I've used
https://tcpdf.org/And would also check out this if I need to do so in the future.
https://docs.reportlab.com/reportlab/userguide/ch1_intro/>
Unless you check to see which tools were used to create the
document, you're unlikely to be able to guesstimate what
shortcomings it may contain.
I don't recall a recent case of a pdf not opening in a perfectly viewable way unless the file is corrupted.