Re: OT: More Climate Madness in the Antipodes

On 29/06/2024 3:29 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:12:19 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
 

On 27/06/2024 8:53 pm, john larkin wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:31:30 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:

>
In reality, the Guardian sticks remarkably closely to the facts, and
gullible twits don't like it.
>
They much prefer the fatuous nonsense curated for them by ZeroHedge and
the like.

 The Guardian is a Left-wing rag, Bill (as you well know).

There are left-wing equivalents of the right-wing extremist media you fancy, but the Guardian isn't any of them. From any rational point of view, it's middle of the road.

As such it's chock full of all the climate alarmism the Watermelons love.

It does report the scientific concensus that you have irrationally chosen to reject.

They've been
busily covering up the cognitive decline of Joe Biden of late - along with
all the other Leftie media sources - but that's going to be extremely
tough to pull off now after last night's revealing performance in the
head-to-head debate with Trump. The man is a fucking basket case and even
though I despise him, it's impossible not to feel desperately sorry for
him and his wife.

He certainly wasn't at his best, and should have a nailed the non-stop stream of lies that Trump was pushing out. Even the healthiest 81-year-old can catch a bad cold and not be able to perform at his best.
Don't get your hopes too high. Trump might be just as devoted to irrational delusions as you are, but that doesn't make  him attractive to the rational majority.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com