Re: OT: EV Charging Stations Stripped of Copper Cables

On 14/07/2024 6:57 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 13:56:40 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
 

On 14/07/2024 2:26 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:18:40 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>

On 13/07/2024 3:21 am, john larkin wrote:

On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:02:30 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>

On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:32:47 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>

On 11/07/2024 10:32 am, john larkin wrote:

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:48:09 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:18:23 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>

On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:52:49 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>

On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:24:30 -0000 (UTC), RJH
<patchmoney@gmx.com>
wrote:
>

On 9 Jul 2024 at 05:04:24 BST, Bill Sloman wrote:

>
<snip>
>

CO2 is not pollution. It is plant food that keeps us alive. More
would be great.

>
CO2 does serve as plant food, along with water, sun light and a bunch
of minerals. Give plants more CO2 and they have fewer stomata in their
leaves, so that they can get the same amount of CO2 while losing less
water.
>
It's also a greenhouse gas, and more of it generates global warming,
which isn't great. Calling it pollution is odd, but more of it does
cause problems.

>
There are *no* "greenhouse gases" in our atmosphere, you damn fool.

>
Not a widely shared delusion.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas
>
list five major greenhouse gases, with water vapour responsible for half
the warming. Joseph Fourier first worked out that the earth's surface
was warmer than it should be back in 1824, and the greenhouse gases
turned out to be the explanation.

 ??? That's glibness in the extreme even by your standards, Bill!

Meaning of glibness in English "the quality of being confident, but too simple and lacking in careful thought : The author's writing has a glibness that sometimes passes as wit".
It's difficult to avoid being glib when faced with such a brain-dead assertion. It would certainly have been a waste of time to ofer a more elborate explanation to a dim clown like you.

You choose to deny this, mainly because you are a gullible sucker for
climate change denial propaganda, but it's the sort of wilful ignorance
that flat-earthers go in for, and not to be taken seriously.
>

Granted there are on other planets in our solar system, but not Earth.
So,
which planet are *you* on with your greenhouse gases, Bill? It clearly
isn't this one.

>
It may be clear to you, but your idea of "clarity" looks like terminal
confusion to anybody with working brain.

 Anyone with a working brain only needs to spend an hour - at most - in any
decent reference library to discover for themselves that the whole AGW
agenda is a SCAM.

A rather curious definition of a "working brain". Mastering the science behind the anthropogenic global warming question would take even a scientifically sophisticated reader (and you aren't that) rather more than an hour. Realising that you didn't have a clue about what was being said might be managed in a hour, and you could throw in the ill-informed conclusion that it was a scam in even less time, but you'd be wrong - as you happen to be , which is evidence that you have a non-working brain, fit only for posturing and pontificating.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com