Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 19:21:23 +0200, Jeroen BellemanIt's not so easy to tell. Electromagnetic motors have benefitted from
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 7/18/24 18:42, Liz Tuddenham wrote:I wonder how many orders of magnitude an electrostatic motor is worseJeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:>
>On 7/18/24 07:46, Jan Panteltje wrote:>Researchers build ultralight drone that flies with onboard solar Bizarre>
design uses a solar-powered motor that's optimized for weight.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/07/researchers-build-ultralight-dro
ne-that-flies-with-onboard-solar/
>
Well, ehh, unlimited flight time if any sun..
Looks funny.
4.5V to 9 kV power converter...
I wonder if electrostatic motors would have been as practical
as electromagnetic motors if the history of motor design had
taken a different turn a century or two ago.
I think Philips dabbled with them many decades ago. A report will be
somewhere in the Philips Technical Review.
>
>
Thanks for that hint. The Philips Technical Review is a treasure
trove of interesting stuff.
>
I found a paper by B. Bollée on electrostatic motors:
<https://pearl-hifi.com/06_Lit_Archive/02_PEARL_Arch/Vol_16/Sec_53/Philips_Tech_Review/PTechReview-30-1969-178.pdf>.
>
Jeroen Belleman
>
than a magnetic motor, in some criterion like power per volume or
power per dollar. 6 maybe?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.