Re: Intel

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Intel
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 06. Aug 2024, 15:06:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8tal5$1kdg6$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/08/2024 3:54 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 05 Aug 2024 09:30:50 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
<tuu1bj9bvd05ru71a219scdql4fp0nijq4@4ax.com>:
 
On Mon, 05 Aug 24 16:10:54 UTC, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 8/5/2024 11:26 AM, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 05 Aug 24 04:42:24 UTC, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 8/3/2024 5:47 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 17:18:33 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
>
On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 12:32:23 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
<snip>

Should not be a problem to wipe out that US .
:-)
Of course it would be even easier to wipe out the United Provinces of the Netherlands - you don't even need nukes to blow holes in a few dikes, and the sea will do the rest.
Submerge ASML and the western chip industry is down the tubes.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Aug 24 * Intel43John Larkin
3 Aug 24 `* Re: Intel42Joe Gwinn
3 Aug 24  +* Re: Intel30John Larkin
3 Aug 24  i+* Re: Intel4Phil Hobbs
4 Aug 24  ii`* Re: Intel3Gerhard Hoffmann
4 Aug 24  ii `* Re: Intel2Dimiter_Popoff
5 Aug 24  ii  `- Re: Intel1Don Y
5 Aug 24  i`* Re: Intel25John Larkin
5 Aug 24  i `* Re: Intel24John Larkin
6 Aug 24  i  +* Re: Intel21Jan Panteltje
6 Aug 24  i  i+* Re: Intel17Bill Sloman
6 Aug 24  i  ii`* Re: Intel16Jan Panteltje
6 Aug 24  i  ii +* Re: Intel3John Larkin
7 Aug 24  i  ii i+- Re: Intel1Jan Panteltje
17 Aug 24  i  ii i`- Re: Intel1Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii `* Re: Intel12Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii  `* Re: Intel11Jan Panteltje
7 Aug 24  i  ii   `* Re: Intel10Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii    `* Re: Intel9Jan Panteltje
7 Aug 24  i  ii     `* Re: Intel8Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii      `* Re: Intel7Jan Panteltje
8 Aug 24  i  ii       `* Re: Intel6Bill Sloman
8 Aug 24  i  ii        `* Re: Intel5Jan Panteltje
10 Aug 24  i  ii         `* Re: Intel4Bill Sloman
12 Aug 24  i  ii          `* Re: Intel3brian
12 Aug 24  i  ii           `* Re: Intel2John Larkin
12 Aug 24  i  ii            `- Re: Intel1Phil Hobbs
6 Aug 24  i  i`* Re: Intel3John Larkin
7 Aug 24  i  i +- Re: Intel1Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  i `- Re: Intel1Jan Panteltje
6 Aug 24  i  `* Re: Intel2bitrex
6 Aug 24  i   `- Re: Intel1John Larkin
4 Aug 24  `* Re: Intel11Don Y
4 Aug 24   `* Re: Intel10TTman
4 Aug 24    +* Re: Intel3John Larkin
4 Aug 24    i`* Re: Intel2Joe Gwinn
4 Aug 24    i `- Re: Intel1John Larkin
4 Aug 24    `* Re: Intel6Don Y
4 Aug 24     `* Re: Intel5piglet
4 Aug 24      +- Re: Intel1Don Y
4 Aug 24      `* Re: Intel3Edward Rawde
4 Aug 24       +- Re: Intel1John Larkin
4 Aug 24       `- Re: Intel1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal