Re: Intel

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Intel
De : alien (at) *nospam* comet.invalid (Jan Panteltje)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 07. Aug 2024, 15:59:22
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <v9024b$t6s1$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (Linux-5.15.32-v7l+)
On a sunny day (Wed, 7 Aug 2024 23:28:00 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <v8vsp7$338jk$1@dont-email.me>:

On 7/08/2024 9:32 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Wed, 7 Aug 2024 17:40:39 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <v8v8dt$29iuv$2@dont-email.me>:
 
On 7/08/2024 4:26 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Wed, 7 Aug 2024 12:44:48 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <v8un36$250b3$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On 7/08/2024 12:22 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Wed, 7 Aug 2024 00:06:25 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <v8tal5$1kdg6$1@dont-email.me>:
>
On 6/08/2024 3:54 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 05 Aug 2024 09:30:50 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
<tuu1bj9bvd05ru71a219scdql4fp0nijq4@4ax.com>:
>
On Mon, 05 Aug 24 16:10:54 UTC, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 8/5/2024 11:26 AM, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 05 Aug 24 04:42:24 UTC, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 8/3/2024 5:47 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 17:18:33 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
>
On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 12:32:23 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
>
<snip>
>
Should not be a problem to wipe out that US .
:-)
>
Of course it would be even easier to wipe out the United Provinces of
the Netherlands - you don't even need nukes to blow holes in a few
dikes, and the sea will do the rest.
>
Submerge ASML and the western chip industry is down the tubes.
>
https://www.rt.com/india/602201-india-semiconductor-manufacturing/
if blocked try
    89.191.237.192
quote:
    "
     India’s Tata Electronics has begun the construction of a new $3.2 billion semiconductor plant,
    which is expected to generate 27,000 jobs.
    The plant will be located in Assam, the largest of the states in India’s northeast,
    and produce over 48 million chips per day using locally-developed technologies,
    India’s electronics and information technology minister has said.
    The plant has already hired around 1,000 locals for the project,
    Tata chairperson N. Chandrasekaran said at the ‘bhumi pujan’ ceremony
    (a Hindu ritual performed ahead of construction) for the plant.
    The facility is expected to generate 15,000 direct and 11,000 to 13,000 indirect jobs when it opens, he said.
    "
>
What ASML does is likely copied in a short while.
>
Perhaps not. What Phil Hobbs recent book revealed is that it isn't easy
to copy or improve. It's bound to happen eventually, but "a short while"
is unrealistic (like most of Jan's claims).
>
    US tries to stop ASML from supplying China with the latest chip tech.
>
As to US, it will either be nuked into oblivion or self-destruct, maybe even both.
>
Competing against India is a no-go for that US.
>
Today they were babbling about a pre-emptive strike on Iran.
Bunch of lunatics, US mafia...
>
Much of it is without power now after the latest storm in Florida
a lot will be under-water soon.
No need for bombs.
Nature.
>
The Dutch have been resisting nature for quite a while now, since long
before the United Provinces got united under William the Silent.
>
Right, higher IQ helps
>
Not that the Netherlands can claim that. Jan certainly can't.
>
So many empires came and went, some because of climate changes.
>
But very few because of climate changes that they initiated, and could
reverse. And the US isn't any kind of empire, any more than the first
Dutch Republic was.
>
Look up this:
   http://old.world-mysteries.com/alignments/mpl_al3b.htm
>
Don't bother. It's totally irrelevant to the climate change we are now
seeing. It does have something to do to with Milankovich cycles, but

i


https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/earth-science/why-milankovitch-orbital-cycles-cant-explain-earths-current-warming/
 
There is a lot NASA cannot explain as it is a pawn in the game of a big industry and locked in dumbness by
dancing to the tune of poly-ticsians some of which are religious biased to the point of poining out that earth was created
4000 years ago,
species Kamala is derived for Adam who did it with Eve, Pi is 4 and what not..
When life is detected on Mars by their own experiment they deny it so as to keep funding by them religious fanatoc freaks
going:
  http://www.gillevin.com/
 
A little while ago (in cosmic terms) there was the little ice age.
There is a lot to read here:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
 
So fast variations in temperature over short times (several hundred years) and the fact we are now in a solar sunspot maximum
helps sell the Al Gore crap.
>
Twaddle.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum
>
It doesn't seem to have any effect on the earth's climate. The little
ice age was pretty much confined to the north Atlantic region, so it has
nothing to do with global warming or cooling - despite the crap you try
to peddle.

Try reading it anyways, you see for example that when it was cold and food got scarce, witches were burned
Helped the church perhaps (it uses fiction to manipulate and control people and suck people for money), or sellers of wood.
Now those temperature changes are blamed on CO2.
CO2 / witches.. what's next?

If you DID read it you would see it largely WAS global.


Generations are now brought up who glue themselves to the ground blocking normal activity that HELPS
us cope with life, they claim to 'save the earth' In fact they are too  dumb to even know how to connect a light bulb.
All should be sent to a re-eductation camp as the Gore crap and CO2 crap polluted their brains and yours.
>
Somebody who believes what he reads in the Daily Telegraph and Russia
Today hasn't got a brain to pollute. You are as silly as Cursitor Doom.
>
The Al Gore sales crap that we caused it all, is just a way to sell more, often useless, stuff
and break all good things.
>
Or so Jan likes to think - or rather that's what the fossil carbon
extraction industry want's him to think.
>
We need to bring all energy sources online to be able to cope (aircos, safe underground places perhaps) with a changing
climate
Else mass migration and mass death of human beings is pre-programmmed.
>
It isn't.
>
Human species could be decimated by 90 % or more...
>
 
And pigs might fly
 
Easy
book a flight for those, AS LONG AS AIRPLANES ARE STILL ALLOWED BY THOSE CLIMATE IDIOTS
now they already screw up flights by glueing themselves to the runways..
>
Really? Where? You do invent a lot of nonsense.

 https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-e&q=climate+activist+block+german+airport+by+glueing

Learn to use google, its not that hard for most humming beans.

And while you are at it, see that CO2 LAGGED warmer periods in the long ago past:
 http://www.co2science.org/articles/V6/N26/EDIT.php
  has some references.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Aug 24 * Intel43John Larkin
3 Aug 24 `* Re: Intel42Joe Gwinn
3 Aug 24  +* Re: Intel30John Larkin
3 Aug 24  i+* Re: Intel4Phil Hobbs
4 Aug 24  ii`* Re: Intel3Gerhard Hoffmann
4 Aug 24  ii `* Re: Intel2Dimiter_Popoff
5 Aug 24  ii  `- Re: Intel1Don Y
5 Aug 24  i`* Re: Intel25John Larkin
5 Aug 24  i `* Re: Intel24John Larkin
6 Aug 24  i  +* Re: Intel21Jan Panteltje
6 Aug 24  i  i+* Re: Intel17Bill Sloman
6 Aug 24  i  ii`* Re: Intel16Jan Panteltje
6 Aug 24  i  ii +* Re: Intel3John Larkin
7 Aug 24  i  ii i+- Re: Intel1Jan Panteltje
17 Aug 24  i  ii i`- Re: Intel1Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii `* Re: Intel12Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii  `* Re: Intel11Jan Panteltje
7 Aug 24  i  ii   `* Re: Intel10Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii    `* Re: Intel9Jan Panteltje
7 Aug 24  i  ii     `* Re: Intel8Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  ii      `* Re: Intel7Jan Panteltje
8 Aug 24  i  ii       `* Re: Intel6Bill Sloman
8 Aug 24  i  ii        `* Re: Intel5Jan Panteltje
10 Aug 24  i  ii         `* Re: Intel4Bill Sloman
12 Aug 24  i  ii          `* Re: Intel3brian
12 Aug 24  i  ii           `* Re: Intel2John Larkin
12 Aug 24  i  ii            `- Re: Intel1Phil Hobbs
6 Aug 24  i  i`* Re: Intel3John Larkin
7 Aug 24  i  i +- Re: Intel1Bill Sloman
7 Aug 24  i  i `- Re: Intel1Jan Panteltje
6 Aug 24  i  `* Re: Intel2bitrex
6 Aug 24  i   `- Re: Intel1John Larkin
4 Aug 24  `* Re: Intel11Don Y
4 Aug 24   `* Re: Intel10TTman
4 Aug 24    +* Re: Intel3John Larkin
4 Aug 24    i`* Re: Intel2Joe Gwinn
4 Aug 24    i `- Re: Intel1John Larkin
4 Aug 24    `* Re: Intel6Don Y
4 Aug 24     `* Re: Intel5piglet
4 Aug 24      +- Re: Intel1Don Y
4 Aug 24      `* Re: Intel3Edward Rawde
4 Aug 24       +- Re: Intel1John Larkin
4 Aug 24       `- Re: Intel1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal