Sujet : Re: yes!
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 20. Aug 2024, 15:58:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <va2aup$3dra1$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 20/08/2024 12:57 pm, john larkin wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:31:53 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
"john larkin" <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in message news:4mt7cjdnqt4i601lvdsrtivbg4iucgfuj4@4ax.com...
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:48:36 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"john larkin" <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in message news:r7m6cjtpei82u2kg6a7g40r07okju99v5n@4ax.com...
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:21:55 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
On 19/08/2024 3:26 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:33:38 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
On 18/08/2024 2:31 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:14:51 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"john larkin" <jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in message news:dta1cj1f3pudq93ard2o2ve4dadero917e@4ax.com...
On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 06:26:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
On a sunny day (Fri, 16 Aug 2024 15:07:52 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in <06jvbjp36khao0m5ot65a1o1krricoasre@4ax.com>:
>
...
>
>
I only got a couple of pages in AoE3,
>
Which pages?
>
Around 360.
>
>
Ok since posting the question I discovered that you're mentioned on pages xxx, 294, 360, 524
>
Bill Sloman should probably not read page 360.
>
His whining centers on my inability to explain how I design
electronics, or where ideas come from.
"Whining"? That isn't what I'm complaining about - John Larkin doesn't explain what his circuits are intended to do or what problems their - presumably unique - features are intended to deal with,
Design is all about using what you can get to do what you need to do, and a useful conversation about circuit design has to be specific about both the problems being dealt with and the way the approach adopted solves them.
Sorry, I don't know. It just happens. If invention happened from
definable algorithms, everything would be invented all at once.
So he just stumbles across his solutions, and doesn't know why they actually work. That isn't design.
I have put circuits together that worked better than I expected, but I then put a lot of effort into finding out what was actually going on, so it didn't stop working in the middle of demonstration.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
yes!
Re: yes!