Re: Instead scopes

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Instead scopes
De : alien (at) *nospam* comet.invalid (Jan Panteltje)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 29. Aug 2024, 17:21:21
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <vaq762$1ssg1$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (Linux-5.15.32-v7l+)
On a sunny day (Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:43:39 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vaq1f2$jdj$1@dont-email.me>:

It's lot easier and quicker to bread-board a circuit in LTSpice than it
is to wire up a test circuit, but what that means is that you need to
make fewer real circuits and they are a lot more likely to work when tested.
>
That, on it's own, is enough to explain why labs look different today
than they did in the dark ages.

All it explains is boeings falling apart and astronuts ending up stuck at the ISS
and no moonlanding from the US, not even a probe.
Slimulations are _not_ realty and never will be.
mamamatical bullshit much of the time
That is why we are stuck with Albert onestone crap and wrong cosmological models
that even a 10 year old can see are wrong.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal