Re: Instead scopes

On 30/08/2024 2:21 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:43:39 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vaq1f2$jdj$1@dont-email.me>:
 

It's lot easier and quicker to bread-board a circuit in LTSpice than it
is to wire up a test circuit, but what that means is that you need to
make fewer real circuits and they are a lot more likely to work when tested.
>
That, on it's own, is enough to explain why labs look different today
than they did in the dark ages.

 All it explains is boeings falling apart and astronuts ending up stuck at the ISS
and no moonlanding from the US, not even a probe.
Slimulations are _not_ realty and never will be.

But they can capture useful parts of reality, if you know what you are doing.
John Larkin's simulated inductors tend not to have any parallel capacitance.

mathematical bullshit much of the time.

It does happen. You do have to know what to look out for.

That is why we are stuck with Albert onestone crap and wrong cosmological models
that even a 10 year old can see are wrong.

Ten year-old don't usually know all that much, and quite a lot of perfectly correct ideas look wrong to them, as they do to you, for much the same reasons.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney