Re: Instead scopes

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Instead scopes
De : alien (at) *nospam* comet.invalid (Jan Panteltje)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 01. Sep 2024, 12:06:20
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <vb1hrd$1ver2$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (Linux-5.15.32-v7l+)
On a sunny day (Sun, 1 Sep 2024 17:45:46 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vb163a$1dt9b$1@dont-email.me>:

On 30/08/2024 2:21 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:43:39 +1000) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vaq1f2$jdj$1@dont-email.me>:
 
It's lot easier and quicker to bread-board a circuit in LTSpice than it
is to wire up a test circuit, but what that means is that you need to
make fewer real circuits and they are a lot more likely to work when tested.
>
That, on it's own, is enough to explain why labs look different today
than they did in the dark ages.
 
All it explains is boeings falling apart and astronuts ending up stuck at the ISS
and no moonlanding from the US, not even a probe.
Slimulations are _not_ realty and never will be.
>
But they can capture useful parts of reality, if you know what you are
doing.
>
John Larkin's simulated inductors tend not to have any parallel capacitance.
>
mathematical bullshit much of the time.
>
It does happen. You do have to know what to look out for.
>
That is why we are stuck with Albert onestone crap and wrong cosmological models
that even a 10 year old can see are wrong.
>
Ten year-old don't usually know all that much,

'Usually'
I was looking back at stuff I worked at at <10 years old, like OLED TV display
long before anyone even had the idea AFAIK.
I made conductors with carbon pencil on paper and tried stuff if it would light up if
the crossings were powered.


and quite a lot of  perfectly correct ideas look wrong to them, as they do to you, for much
the same reasons.

The whole stuff of what they call big bang is sold the wrong way around
If indeed there was a big explosion the resulting fragments were black holes that then later started spewing out
material that formed galaxies or was - and became stars
Like fireworks.
In a space that is NOT empty, like a garden sprinkler in the air.
Albert onestone crap is jewish brainwash that has indoctrinated science now for long enough
The creep never did an experiment in his life apart from a bad working fridge,
his mamamatical stuff he likely stole from his wife who was a mamatician and his relatitvitty stuff
came from the same source, nothing related the the atom bomb really came from him apart
from suggesting to the then US precedent to use it for genocide on the Japanese
He took Bose's paper and put his own name on it (Bose onestone condensate).
Albert's way of thinking was proven wrong in the eighties by Aspect.
His time / space is curved shit means he had no clue of any mechanism...
Look up Le Sage wikidia for a mechanism.
Albert's is as dumb as is electrickety without electrons
Billions are wasted in job creation programs for parrots of his crap,
like CERN and ITER that never go anywhere.

:-)


Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Sep 24 * Re: Instead scopes44Bill Sloman
1 Sep 24 +* Re: Instead scopes8Jan Panteltje
1 Sep 24 i`* Re: Instead scopes7Bill Sloman
1 Sep 24 i `* Re: Instead scopes6Jan Panteltje
1 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Instead scopes5Bill Sloman
2 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Instead scopes4Jan Panteltje
2 Sep 24 i    `* Re: Instead scopes3Bill Sloman
2 Sep 24 i     `* Re: Instead scopes2Jan Panteltje
2 Sep 24 i      `- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
1 Sep 24 `* Re: Instead scopes35john larkin
1 Sep 24  +* Re: Instead scopes7Bill Sloman
1 Sep 24  i`* Re: Instead scopes6john larkin
2 Sep 24  i +* Re: Instead scopes2Jan Panteltje
2 Sep 24  i i`- Re: Instead scopes1Jan Panteltje
2 Sep 24  i `* Re: Instead scopes3Bill Sloman
2 Sep 24  i  `* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
3 Sep 24  i   `- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
1 Sep 24  +* Re: Instead scopes22Phil Hobbs
1 Sep 24  i`* Re: Instead scopes21Joe Gwinn
1 Sep 24  i `* Re: Instead scopes20john larkin
1 Sep 24  i  `* Re: Instead scopes19Joe Gwinn
2 Sep 24  i   +* Re: Instead scopes16john larkin
2 Sep 24  i   i+- Re: Instead scopes1Jan Panteltje
2 Sep 24  i   i+* Re: Instead scopes3Bill Sloman
2 Sep 24  i   ii`* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
3 Sep 24  i   ii `- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
2 Sep 24  i   i`* Re: Instead scopes11Joe Gwinn
2 Sep 24  i   i +* Re: Instead scopes8Phil Hobbs
2 Sep 24  i   i i`* Re: Instead scopes7john larkin
2 Sep 24  i   i i +* Re: Instead scopes2Phil Hobbs
4 Sep 24  i   i i i`- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin
3 Sep 24  i   i i +* Re: Instead scopes3Bill Sloman
4 Sep 24  i   i i i`* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
5 Sep 24  i   i i i `- Re: Instead scopes1Bill Sloman
3 Sep 24  i   i i `- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin
2 Sep 24  i   i `* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
2 Sep 24  i   i  `- Re: Instead scopes1Joe Gwinn
2 Sep 24  i   `* Re: Instead scopes2john larkin
2 Sep 24  i    `- Re: Instead scopes1Joe Gwinn
9 Sep 24  `* Re: Instead scopes5piglet
9 Sep 24   +* Re: Instead scopes3Jeroen Belleman
9 Sep 24   i+- Re: Instead scopes1Liz Tuddenham
9 Sep 24   i`- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin
9 Sep 24   `- Re: Instead scopes1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal