Re: Better cheaper super capacitors

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Better cheaper super capacitors
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 08. Sep 2024, 17:14:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbkigu$1vpl0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/09/2024 1:41 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sun, 08 Sep 2024 07:34:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
 
On a sunny day (Sat, 07 Sep 2024 08:45:22 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in <stsodj1etjq4bnfbea9gqlbeefbf40p4pr@4ax.com>:
>
On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 05:24:50 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
Achieving a supercapacitor through the 'molecular coating' approach
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240905121043.htm
>
I doubt that supercaps will ever achieve the energy density of
batteries, and if they get close they will be equally explosive.
>
People are inventing super "capacitors" that sound awfully
electrochemical to me.
>
The threshold for a press release seems to be to make something that
will light an LED, which takes about a microwatt.
>
Yes, new batteries are invented every week it seems.
Now super capacitors too
We will have to wait for it to be in the shops.
 Methane has half the carbon of a long-chain liquid hydrocarbon. In
most situations, a 2:1 improvement is considered to be pretty good.
But in the current situation a 2:1 improvement isn't good enough.
We have to cut our carbon emissions right back to stop global warming - the aim is to get the atmospheric CO2 level back to the regular inter-glacial 270ppm.

CNG cars work.  But the greenies hate methane.
For good reason.

As they hate nukes and hydro power.
For very different reasons.
They aren't enthusiastic about nukes - we still haven't got an acceptable way of dealing with nuclear waste. It does stay dangerous for abut 100,000 years.
The aren't all that enthusiastic about flooding valleys to create hydro-electric reservoirs. It does mess up the local environment, and always seems to drive some species or other to extinction.

They hate energy.
They don't. They just have reservations about some of the ways we generate it.
This is good example of you expressing yourself clearly, but expressing unfortunate opinions you have picked up from climate change denial propaganda, which you should have been able to recognise as fatuous nonsense but have swallowed, hook, line and sinker.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Sep 24 * Better cheaper super capacitors15Jan Panteltje
7 Sep 24 `* Re: Better cheaper super capacitors14john larkin
8 Sep 24  +* Re: Better cheaper super capacitors9Jan Panteltje
8 Sep 24  i`* Re: Better cheaper super capacitors8john larkin
8 Sep 24  i +* Re: Better cheaper super capacitors3Bill Sloman
9 Sep 24  i i`* Re: Better cheaper super capacitors2Liz Tuddenham
9 Sep 24  i i `- Re: Better cheaper super capacitors1Bill Sloman
9 Sep 24  i `* Re: Better cheaper super capacitors4Jan Panteltje
9 Sep 24  i  +- Re: Better cheaper super capacitors1Bill Sloman
9 Sep 24  i  `* Re: Better cheaper super capacitors2john larkin
10 Sep 24  i   `- Re: Better cheaper super capacitors1Bill Sloman
10 Sep 24  `* Re: Better cheaper super capacitors4Cursitor Doom
11 Sep 24   `* Re: Better cheaper super capacitors3Bill Sloman
11 Sep 24    `* Re: Better cheaper super capacitors2Liz Tuddenham
11 Sep 24     `- Re: Better cheaper super capacitors1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal