Re: Random thoughts on sinewave oscillators

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Random thoughts on sinewave oscillators
De : cd999666 (at) *nospam* notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 18. Oct 2024, 17:59:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <veu45s$3cmo3$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 11:25:19 -0400, Edward Rawde wrote:

"piglet" <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:vetde5$38sbk$1@dont-email.me...
Edward Rawde <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
The circuit below produces a reasonable looking sinewave but the rise
time still seems to be slower than the fall time. It may be that the
amplifier in use is not ideal for this.
>
>
Could that just be second harmonic distortion? You could test the
amplifier by uncoupling the Wien network and injecting test inputs.
>
Elsewhere I think your amplitude control problems could be simply due
to too much gain.
 
Perhaps, but I've not so far been able to get the circuit I posted in
response to Bill to produce a sine wave no matter what I do with the
control loop gain.
It either grows to clipping or dies.

That's the main purpose behind having a thermistor or filament bulb in the
f/b path.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Oct 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal