Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 13:47:02 -0400, Edward Rawde wrote:
>"Cursitor Doom" <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote in message>
news:veu45s$3cmo3$5@dont-email.me...On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 11:25:19 -0400, Edward Rawde wrote:>
>"piglet" <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote in message>
news:vetde5$38sbk$1@dont-email.me...Edward Rawde <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:>>Could that just be second harmonic distortion? You could test the
The circuit below produces a reasonable looking sinewave but the
rise time still seems to be slower than the fall time. It may be
that the amplifier in use is not ideal for this.
>
>
amplifier by uncoupling the Wien network and injecting test inputs.
>
Elsewhere I think your amplitude control problems could be simply due
to too much gain.
Perhaps, but I've not so far been able to get the circuit I posted in
response to Bill to produce a sine wave no matter what I do with the
control loop gain.
It either grows to clipping or dies.
That's the main purpose behind having a thermistor or filament bulb in
the f/b path.
Sure, but why use thermistors or filaments if you don't have to?
Filaments don't last forever, particularly not if you drop your
equipment, and filaments make me think of something like a 5U4.
I forget when I last saw a filament. House lamps don't even have them
now.
>
I'm trying to make a low cost oscillator which produces the cleanest 1K
Hz sinewave I can get, using only resistors, capacitors and
semiconductors.
>
There are plenty of examples online, but some of them don't seem to
simulate.
Whether that's because they do work in reality but not in simulation is
hard to say.
A real-world oscillator needs some kind of stimulus to start up.
This could be a voltage 'shock' at switch-on or just inherent noise in the
circuitry. JL informs me LTSpice doesn't have such a stimulus unless you
provide it yourself. I suspect that's the main reason you will find
oscillators difficult to get started in simulation.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.