The Wien Bridge Oscillator problem (your Sunday ruined part1)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : The Wien Bridge Oscillator problem (your Sunday ruined part1)
De : cd999666 (at) *nospam* notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 20. Oct 2024, 17:36:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vf3bhp$g5ng$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Gentlemen,

How critical is the choice of thermistor for a WB oscillator? Stability is
desired; we know that much (along with minimal distortion of course). The
usual problem with WB oscillators is they are not amplitude stable and
either die out or saturate. However, by means of a non-linear negative f/b
arrangement, they *can* be made stable. One common solution is to use a
thermistor, usually one with a positive temperature coefficient. The issue
is, that it must be 'nimble' enough to regulate the output level without
being *so* 'nimble' as to respond to peaks and troughs of the output
signal's cycles. I'm going to call this 'nimbleness' "tau" for the time
being. I know it's not the right Greek letter, but no doubt some helpful
soul will point out the correct one.
So the question is, how the hell do you select a thermistor with the
optimum 'tau' for any given wideband WB oscillator?

Your pal,

CD.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Oct 24 * The Wien Bridge Oscillator problem (your Sunday ruined part1)6Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 `* Re: The Wien Bridge Oscillator problem (your Sunday ruined part1)5piglet
20 Oct 24  `* Re: The Wien Bridge Oscillator problem (your Sunday ruined part1)4Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24   `* Re: The Wien Bridge Oscillator problem (your Sunday ruined part1)3Jan Panteltje
21 Oct 24    `* Re: The Wien Bridge Oscillator problem (your Sunday ruined part1)2Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24     `- Re: The Wien Bridge Oscillator problem (your Sunday ruined part1)1Jan Panteltje

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal