Re: oscillator gain

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: oscillator gain
De : cd999666 (at) *nospam* notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 20. Oct 2024, 19:38:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vf3ink$g5ng$7@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:06:35 -0400, Joe Gwinn wrote:

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 08:23:56 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
 
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:06:24 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>
Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>
On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 07:05:08 -0700, john larkin wrote:
 
If the loop gain of an oscillator is slightly over 1.00,
oscillations gain amplitude. Just under 1.00, they die out.
 
Economies are like that.
 
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/10/19/record-633000-business-
in-
britain-on-brink-of-collapse-report/
 
And the Communists have only been in government for around 2 months.
It doesn't take long for them to wreck everything!
>
It usually takes a generation to really wreck things, although it has
been done a lot faster.
>
>
Could Breitbart be biassed in some way ?
>
Most news sources are horribly biased, essentially propaganda.
>
Real Clear at least links to both sides.
>
The New York Times seems to be getting a little bit more journalistic
lately. I hope that trend continues.
 
The big alternative to the NYT is the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), which
has been directly criticizing the NYT for their unbalanced coverage, and
is quite useful for pointing out what has been omitted.  In the old
days, the NYT would be the check on the WSJ, and so on.

The WSJ has been owned by Rupert Murdoch for a while now IIRC, so it's not
surprising they're calling out the disgraceful NYT for its biased
coverage.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Oct 24 * oscillator gain40john larkin
19 Oct 24 +* Re: oscillator gain9Jan Panteltje
19 Oct 24 i`* Re: oscillator gain8john larkin
19 Oct 24 i `* Re: oscillator gain7Jan Panteltje
19 Oct 24 i  `* Re: oscillator gain6john larkin
20 Oct 24 i   `* Re: oscillator gain5Jan Panteltje
20 Oct 24 i    `* Re: oscillator gain4Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 i     `* Re: oscillator gain3john larkin
20 Oct 24 i      `* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i       `- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
19 Oct 24 +* Re: oscillator gain25Cursitor Doom
19 Oct 24 i+- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
20 Oct 24 i+- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i+* Re: oscillator gain10Jan Panteltje
20 Oct 24 ii`* Re: oscillator gain9john larkin
20 Oct 24 ii +* Re: oscillator gain3Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 ii i`* Re: oscillator gain2john larkin
21 Oct 24 ii i `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 ii +* Re: oscillator gain4Edward Rawde
21 Oct 24 ii i`* Re: oscillator gain3john larkin
21 Oct 24 ii i `* Re: oscillator gain2Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 ii i  `- Re: oscillator gain1Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 ii `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i`* Re: oscillator gain12Liz Tuddenham
20 Oct 24 i +* Re: oscillator gain3Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 i i+- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i i`- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
20 Oct 24 i `* Re: oscillator gain8john larkin
20 Oct 24 i  +* Re: oscillator gain3Joe Gwinn
20 Oct 24 i  i`* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i  i `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i  `* Re: oscillator gain4john larkin
20 Oct 24 i   +* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i   i`- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 i   `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 +- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 `* Re: oscillator gain4Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24  +- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24  `* Re: oscillator gain2john larkin
22 Oct 24   `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal