Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 25. Oct 2024, 05:25:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vff6je$30vnv$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 25/10/2024 4:48 am, JM wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:16:49 +0100, JM <sunaecoNoSpam@gmail.com> wrote:
 
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 02:05:52 +0100, JM <sunaecoNoSpam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 01:10:41 -0400, "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
But I suspect that component tolerances and mismatched FETs will ruin it.
>
Otherwise it should be easy to get 60dB down on unwanted harmonics with a better filter.
>
FWIW I likely won't be here for the next week.
>
>
If you actually need a low distortion oscillator look for Viktor Mickevic's designs on diyaudio.   I've attached a schematic.
>
PK

>
It seems that I have a problem posting encoded binariesto this group with my provider.  Attached is a link instead.
>
https://1drv.ms/u/c/1af24d72a509cd48/EakMPPRi-pdLgaAKtJ2rrwwBNMGZZsy84MV2QoH1dPcZJQ?e=o59V9a
 And that links to an incorrect schematic - the rectified output tap is connected to the wrong node.  Might be other errors..
Even so, the third harmonic is 78dB below the fundamental. The simulation runs slowly on my computer, so it may take me a while to get the schematic to where the designer intended it to be.
The choice of op amp is what I'd expect from an audio group - it does seem to be a low distortion part.
I just seem to have wrecked the .raw file from the simulation, so it may be a while before I have more to say.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Oct 24 * High purity 1kHz oscillator37Edward Rawde
22 Oct 24 +* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator7Bill Sloman
22 Oct 24 i`* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator6Edward Rawde
22 Oct 24 i +* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator4john larkin
22 Oct 24 i i+- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Edward Rawde
23 Oct 24 i i+- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
22 Nov 24 i i`- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Waldek Hebisch
23 Oct 24 i `- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
22 Oct 24 +* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator5Edward Rawde
23 Oct 24 i+- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1legg
24 Oct 24 i`* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator3Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24 i `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator2legg
25 Oct 24 i  `- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
23 Oct 24 +* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator15JM
24 Oct 24 i`* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator14JM
24 Oct 24 i `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator13JM
25 Oct 24 i  `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator12Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i   `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator11Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i    `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator10JM
25 Oct 24 i     `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator9JM
25 Oct 24 i      `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator8Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i       `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator7JM
25 Oct 24 i        `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator6Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i         `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator5JM
26 Oct 24 i          `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator4Bill Sloman
26 Oct 24 i           `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator3JM
26 Oct 24 i            `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator2Bill Sloman
29 Oct 24 i             `- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
23 Oct 24 `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator9john larkin
24 Oct 24  `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator8Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24   `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator7john larkin
24 Oct 24    +* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator5Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24    i`* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator4John R Walliker
25 Oct 24    i `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator3john larkin
25 Oct 24    i  `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator2Phil Hobbs
25 Oct 24    i   `- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1john larkin
25 Oct 24    `- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal