Redundant power supplies

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Redundant power supplies
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 27. Oct 2024, 07:54:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vfko2a$57tm$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
Most of my boxes have dual power supplies.  Most
don't give me an option as to how they are used/configured;
one shits the bed, the other is there to cover the load.
I have always *assumed* they were configured to SHARE the load.
I picked up another box that gives me the option of NOT operating
them redundantly (what the hell does the "extra" one do, just
sit around??).  And, when in the redundant configuration,
allows me to choose which is the "primary".
This suggests one is carrying the load and the other is switched
in (even if passively) when that one fails.
Is there any advantage to this over a "sharing" configuration?
And, why would I ever want to *disable* PFC?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Oct 24 * Redundant power supplies13Don Y
27 Oct 24 +* Re: Redundant power supplies4legg
27 Oct 24 i`* Re: Redundant power supplies3Don Y
27 Oct 24 i `* Re: Redundant power supplies2legg
28 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Redundant power supplies1Don Y
27 Oct 24 +- Re: Redundant power supplies1john larkin
28 Oct 24 +* Re: Redundant power supplies4Don Y
30 Oct 24 i`* Re: Redundant power supplies3Don Y
30 Oct 24 i `* Re: Redundant power supplies2legg
30 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Redundant power supplies1Don Y
28 Oct 24 `* Re: Redundant power supplies3Lasse Langwadt
28 Oct 24  +- Re: Redundant power supplies1Phil Hobbs
29 Oct 24  `- Re: Redundant power supplies1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal