Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 06. Nov 2024, 03:39:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <vgekth$1anu$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vgbv7l$177js$3@dont-email.me...
On 5/11/2024 3:46 am, Edward Rawde wrote:
"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vga6jh$suru$1@dont-email.me...
On 4/11/2024 5:31 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 3 Nov 2024 23:06:04 -0500) it happened "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in
<vg9h7b$277o$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>:
>
Simulation isn't fast but if you let it complete and do an FFT on the last 30 seconds, it's 80dB down at all unwanted
harmonics.
There do however seem to be unwanted sidebands close in either side of 1KHz
Any suggestions for improvement?
>
Publish a circuit diagram.
Not that hard to make !
>
He did. The .asc file is a circuit diagram. I've looked at it and run the simulation - if only for 200 seconds rather than 300
seconds.
>
The FFT says that sine wave is as good as he claims.
>
The circuit diagram  doesn't make it clear what it's various parts are there to do - it makes sense to group the components in a
way that lets somebody looking at the circuit diagram get some feel for what the components are doing.
>
And it you are using the LT1994 it makes sense to read the data sheet carefully enough to notice that the Icom pin 2 should be
bypassed with at least 100nF to ground.
>
https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/1994fb.pdf
>
Yes there's no way I would use a part without reading the data sheet.
Pass 1 fount the 0.1uF but I hadn't got around to adding it.
Pass 2 found that I couldn't go above +/- 6V
Pass 3 which I haven't done yet would take a lot more time and I probably won't do it because I doubt I'll be able to build this
for
real.
>
Please see also my reply to Jan.
>
>
John May's circuit makes it clear that the second FET isn't strictly necessary. There are cheaper ways of getting rid of the
even-order harmonics.
>
Does his circuit have better performance?
>
The version I got privately certainly did.
>
Just curious, it's not a competition.
>
Actually, I've decided that the second FET is a bad idea. Two different FETs need two different gate drive voltages to give the
right channel resistance, and the only guide you've got to that is the amplitude of the single sine wave you are producing. A
large number of different pairs of FET gate drive voltages could give you the same stable amplitude.
>
If you monitored the second harmonic component of the output you would have a second independent output which could let you
optimise both gate dries at the same time, but that would be an unnecessary refinement.
>

Now approacing 90dB if you believe the simulation with with this experimental circuit.
You'll want to find something else to do while it simulates.
How to inprove it further?

Version 4
SHEET 1 2196 932
WIRE -160 -752 -208 -752
WIRE 16 -752 -80 -752
WIRE 128 -752 16 -752
WIRE 288 -752 208 -752
WIRE -208 -688 -208 -752
WIRE -128 -688 -208 -688
WIRE 80 -688 -64 -688
WIRE 128 -688 80 -688
WIRE 288 -688 288 -752
WIRE 288 -688 192 -688
WIRE 80 -656 80 -688
WIRE 16 -640 16 -752
WIRE 16 -544 16 -576
WIRE 80 -544 80 -576
WIRE 16 -464 16 -480
WIRE 80 -448 48 -448
WIRE 288 -448 288 -688
WIRE 288 -448 80 -448
WIRE -208 -432 -208 -688
WIRE -16 -432 -208 -432
WIRE 192 -416 48 -416
WIRE 240 -416 192 -416
WIRE 368 -416 320 -416
WIRE 432 -416 368 -416
WIRE 512 -416 432 -416
WIRE 624 -416 512 -416
WIRE -208 -384 -208 -432
WIRE 16 -384 16 -400
WIRE 368 -368 368 -416
WIRE 80 -352 80 -448
WIRE 192 -352 192 -416
WIRE 432 -352 432 -416
WIRE 512 -352 512 -416
WIRE 624 -352 624 -416
WIRE -208 -272 -208 -304
WIRE -208 -272 -304 -272
WIRE -208 -240 -208 -272
WIRE 80 -240 80 -272
WIRE 192 -240 192 -288
WIRE 432 -240 432 -288
WIRE 512 -224 512 -288
WIRE 624 -224 624 -288
WIRE 368 -192 368 -288
WIRE 368 -192 -16 -192
WIRE -304 -176 -304 -272
WIRE -336 -128 -368 -128
WIRE -208 -128 -208 -160
WIRE -208 -128 -240 -128
WIRE -192 -128 -208 -128
WIRE 144 -128 -192 -128
WIRE 288 -128 224 -128
WIRE 352 -128 288 -128
WIRE 512 -128 512 -144
WIRE 512 -128 432 -128
WIRE -368 -48 -368 -128
WIRE -320 -48 -368 -48
WIRE -192 -48 -192 -128
WIRE -192 -48 -240 -48
WIRE 288 -16 288 -128
WIRE 288 -16 64 -16
WIRE 352 -16 288 -16
WIRE 512 -16 512 -128
WIRE 512 -16 432 -16
WIRE -368 0 -368 -48
WIRE 144 48 144 32
WIRE 64 96 64 -16
WIRE 112 96 64 96
WIRE 512 96 512 -16
WIRE 512 96 272 96
WIRE -32 128 -112 128
WIRE -16 128 -16 -192
WIRE -16 128 -32 128
WIRE 112 128 -16 128
WIRE -336 144 -416 144
WIRE -272 144 -336 144
WIRE 624 144 624 -144
WIRE 656 144 624 144
WIRE 768 144 720 144
WIRE 848 144 768 144
WIRE -112 160 -112 128
WIRE 112 160 64 160
WIRE 624 160 624 144
WIRE 624 160 272 160
WIRE -416 192 -416 144
WIRE -272 208 -272 144
WIRE 144 224 144 208
WIRE 848 240 848 144
WIRE -112 256 -112 224
WIRE 64 272 64 160
WIRE 160 272 64 272
WIRE 256 272 160 272
WIRE 352 272 320 272
WIRE 512 272 512 96
WIRE 512 272 432 272
WIRE 64 288 64 272
WIRE 160 288 160 272
WIRE 512 320 512 272
WIRE 624 320 624 160
WIRE -416 368 -416 272
WIRE -416 368 -496 368
WIRE -496 384 -496 368
WIRE -416 384 -416 368
WIRE -272 384 -272 272
WIRE -272 384 -416 384
WIRE 64 384 64 368
WIRE 160 384 160 352
WIRE 160 384 64 384
WIRE 64 416 64 384
WIRE 848 416 848 320
WIRE -32 448 -32 128
WIRE -416 464 -416 384
WIRE 144 464 96 464
WIRE 256 464 224 464
WIRE 368 464 320 464
WIRE -272 480 -272 384
WIRE 512 480 512 400
WIRE 624 480 624 400
WIRE 288 576 288 560
WIRE 368 592 368 464
WIRE 368 592 320 592
WIRE 624 592 624 544
WIRE 624 592 368 592
WIRE -32 608 -32 528
WIRE 32 608 -32 608
WIRE 96 608 96 464
WIRE 96 608 32 608
WIRE 144 608 96 608
WIRE 256 608 224 608
WIRE 432 624 320 624
WIRE 512 624 512 544
WIRE 512 624 432 624
WIRE 624 624 624 592
WIRE 704 624 624 624
WIRE -416 640 -416 544
WIRE -336 640 -416 640
WIRE -272 640 -272 544
WIRE -272 640 -336 640
WIRE 288 656 288 640
WIRE 512 688 512 624
WIRE 704 688 704 624
WIRE 432 704 432 624
WIRE 624 704 624 624
WIRE 432 800 432 768
WIRE 512 800 512 768
WIRE 512 800 432 800
WIRE 624 800 624 768
WIRE 624 800 512 800
WIRE 704 800 704 768
WIRE 704 800 624 800
WIRE 432 832 432 800
FLAG -496 384 0
FLAG 288 560 V+
FLAG 144 224 V-
FLAG -336 144 V+
FLAG -336 640 V-
FLAG 768 144 output
FLAG 144 32 V+
FLAG 288 656 V-
FLAG 432 832 0
FLAG -112 256 0
FLAG 32 608 dc-trim
FLAG 16 -480 V+
FLAG 16 -384 V-
FLAG -368 0 0
FLAG 432 -240 0
FLAG 192 -240 0
FLAG 848 416 0
FLAG 64 416 0
FLAG 80 -240 0
FLAG 16 -544 0
FLAG 80 -544 0
SYMBOL voltage -416 176 R0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 10 135 Left 2
WINDOW 0 12 7 Left 2
WINDOW 3 15 104 Left 2
SYMATTR SpiceLine Rser=0.01
SYMATTR InstName V1
SYMATTR Value 6
SYMBOL res 448 256 R90
WINDOW 0 -7 54 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 37 50 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName R1
SYMATTR Value 10.5k
SYMBOL cap 320 256 R90
WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName C1
SYMATTR Value 0.015�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=16 Irms=271m Rser=0.594318 Lser=0 mfg="KEMET" pn="C0603C153K4RAC" type="X7R"
SYMBOL res 240 -144 R90
WINDOW 0 -1 46 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 35 56 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName R7
SYMATTR Value 6.34k
SYMBOL res 448 -144 R90
WINDOW 0 -4 61 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 39 55 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName R8
SYMATTR Value 13k
SYMBOL njf -240 -176 R90
WINDOW 0 -37 23 VRight 2
WINDOW 3 -9 -3 VRight 2
SYMATTR InstName J1
SYMATTR Value J112
SYMBOL voltage -416 448 R0
WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
WINDOW 39 10 135 Left 2
WINDOW 0 10 0 Left 2
WINDOW 3 15 104 Left 2
SYMATTR SpiceLine Rser=0.01
SYMATTR InstName V2
SYMATTR Value 6
SYMBOL res 48 272 R0
WINDOW 3 36 65 Left 2
SYMATTR Value 10.5k
SYMATTR InstName R2
SYMBOL res 496 -240 R0
SYMATTR InstName R9
SYMATTR Value 4.7
SYMBOL schottky 496 -352 R0
WINDOW 3 -17 -1 VRight 2
SYMATTR Value BAS40HY
SYMATTR InstName D1
SYMATTR Description Diode
SYMATTR Type diode
SYMBOL schottky 608 -352 R0
WINDOW 3 -18 1 VRight 2
SYMATTR Value BAS40HY
SYMATTR InstName D2
SYMATTR Description Diode
SYMATTR Type diode
SYMBOL res -224 -64 R90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName R3
SYMATTR Value 82
SYMBOL OpAmps\LT1994 176 128 R0
WINDOW 3 10 -65 Left 2
WINDOW 0 11 -95 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName U2
SYMBOL OpAmps\LT1057 288 544 M0
WINDOW 0 19 104 Left 2
WINDOW 3 18 130 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName U1
SYMBOL schottky 528 480 M0
WINDOW 3 54 -49 VRight 2
WINDOW 0 -18 3 Left 2
SYMATTR Value BAS40HY
SYMATTR InstName D3
SYMATTR Description Diode
SYMATTR Type diode
SYMBOL schottky 640 480 M0
WINDOW 3 48 -53 VRight 2
WINDOW 0 -21 4 Left 2
SYMATTR Value BAS40HY
SYMATTR InstName D4
SYMATTR Description Diode
SYMATTR Type diode
SYMBOL cap 448 704 M0
SYMATTR InstName C7
SYMATTR Value 10�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=6.3 Irms=0 Rser=0.001 Lser=0 mfg="TDK" pn="C3216X5ROJ106M" type="X5R"
SYMBOL res 528 672 M0
WINDOW 3 30 83 Left 2
SYMATTR Value 220k
SYMATTR InstName R11
SYMBOL res 720 672 M0
WINDOW 3 29 83 Left 2
SYMATTR Value 220k
SYMATTR InstName R12
SYMBOL res -224 -256 R0
WINDOW 0 38 42 Left 2
WINDOW 3 36 66 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName R6
SYMATTR Value 2.2k
SYMBOL res 224 -400 R270
WINDOW 0 -29 23 VTop 2
WINDOW 3 -1 95 VBottom 2
SYMATTR InstName R15
SYMATTR Value 330k
SYMBOL res 352 -384 R0
WINDOW 0 -57 53 Left 2
WINDOW 3 -63 90 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName R17
SYMATTR Value 100k
SYMBOL cap 640 704 M0
SYMATTR InstName C8
SYMATTR Value 10�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=6.3 Irms=0 Rser=0.001 Lser=0 mfg="TDK" pn="C3216X5ROJ106M" type="X5R"
SYMBOL res 448 -32 R90
WINDOW 0 -4 61 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 39 55 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName R5
SYMATTR Value 1.095Meg
SYMBOL res 608 -240 R0
SYMATTR InstName R10
SYMATTR Value 4.7
SYMBOL res -192 -288 R180
WINDOW 0 40 70 Left 2
WINDOW 3 45 42 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName R20
SYMATTR Value 2.2k
SYMBOL res -16 544 R180
WINDOW 0 36 76 Left 2
WINDOW 3 36 40 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName R16
SYMATTR Value 47k
SYMBOL res 128 448 M90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName R18
SYMATTR Value 220
SYMBOL res 528 304 M0
WINDOW 0 36 27 Left 2
WINDOW 3 39 52 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName R21
SYMATTR Value 4.7
SYMBOL res 640 304 M0
WINDOW 0 38 27 Left 2
WINDOW 3 40 51 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName R22
SYMATTR Value 4.7
SYMBOL res 128 592 M90
WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName R23
SYMATTR Value 100
SYMBOL cap 416 -352 R0
WINDOW 0 -27 5 Left 2
WINDOW 3 -35 47 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName C3
SYMATTR Value 22�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=6.3 Irms=0 Rser=0.0028 Lser=544p mfg="W�rth Elektronik" pn="885012107005 WCAP-CSGP 0805" type="X5R"
SYMBOL cap 176 352 R180
WINDOW 0 -36 39 Left 2
WINDOW 3 -86 12 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName C2
SYMATTR Value 0.015�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=16 Irms=271m Rser=0.594318 Lser=0 mfg="KEMET" pn="C0603C153K4RAC" type="X7R"
SYMBOL cap -288 208 R0
SYMATTR InstName C4
SYMATTR Value 100�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=6.3 Irms=0 Rser=0.002 Lser=0 mfg="TDK" pn="C575OX5ROJI07M" type="X5R"
SYMBOL cap -288 480 R0
SYMATTR InstName C5
SYMATTR Value 100�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=6.3 Irms=0 Rser=0.002 Lser=0 mfg="TDK" pn="C575OX5ROJI07M" type="X5R"
SYMBOL cap 256 448 M90
WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName C9
SYMATTR Value 10�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=6.3 Irms=0 Rser=0.001 Lser=0 mfg="TDK" pn="C3216X5ROJ106M" type="X5R"
SYMBOL OpAmps\LT1057 16 -496 M0
WINDOW 0 73 93 Left 2
WINDOW 3 18 119 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName U3
SYMBOL cap 720 128 R90
WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2
WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2
SYMATTR InstName C6
SYMATTR Value 1�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=10 Irms=0 Rser=0.0065 Lser=542p mfg="W�rth Elektronik" pn="885012208013 WCAP-CSGP 1206" type="X7R"
SYMBOL res 832 224 R0
SYMATTR InstName R4
SYMATTR Value 100k
SYMBOL cap -128 160 R0
SYMATTR InstName C10
SYMATTR Value 1�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=10 Irms=0 Rser=0.0065 Lser=542p mfg="W�rth Elektronik" pn="885012208013 WCAP-CSGP 1206" type="X7R"
SYMBOL res 112 -736 R270
WINDOW 0 34 21 VTop 2
WINDOW 3 62 88 VBottom 2
SYMATTR InstName R13
SYMATTR Value 22k
SYMBOL res 64 -368 R0
SYMATTR InstName R14
SYMATTR Value 22k
SYMBOL res -176 -736 R270
WINDOW 0 34 21 VTop 2
WINDOW 3 62 88 VBottom 2
SYMATTR InstName R19
SYMATTR Value 22k
SYMBOL res 64 -672 R0
SYMATTR InstName R24
SYMATTR Value 10k
SYMBOL cap -128 -672 R270
WINDOW 0 32 32 VTop 2
WINDOW 3 0 32 VBottom 2
SYMATTR InstName C16
SYMATTR Value 0.0082�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=25 Irms=0 Rser=0 Lser=0 mfg="Murata" pn="GCM155R71E822JA37" type="X7R"
SYMBOL cap 32 -576 R180
WINDOW 0 24 56 Left 2
WINDOW 3 24 8 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName C11
SYMATTR Value 0.015�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=16 Irms=271m Rser=0.594318 Lser=0 mfg="KEMET" pn="C0603C153K4RAC" type="X7R"
SYMBOL cap 128 -672 R270
WINDOW 0 32 32 VTop 2
WINDOW 3 0 32 VBottom 2
SYMATTR InstName C12
SYMATTR Value 0.0082�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=25 Irms=0 Rser=0 Lser=0 mfg="Murata" pn="GCM155R71E822JA37" type="X7R"
SYMBOL cap 176 -352 R0
WINDOW 0 22 11 Left 2
WINDOW 3 21 58 Left 2
SYMATTR InstName C13
SYMATTR Value 22�
SYMATTR SpiceLine V=6.3 Irms=0 Rser=0.0028 Lser=544p mfg="W�rth Elektronik" pn="885012107005 WCAP-CSGP 0805" type="X5R"
TEXT -456 728 Left 2 !.tran 0 300s 0s startup
TEXT -288 -856 Left 2 ;Edward Rawde's high purity sinewave oscillator. 5 Nov 2024






Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Nov 24 * 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz64Edward Rawde
4 Nov 24 +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz62Jan Panteltje
4 Nov 24 i+* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz23Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 ii`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz22Edward Rawde
5 Nov 24 ii `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz21Bill Sloman
6 Nov 24 ii  `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz20Edward Rawde
6 Nov 24 ii   +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz8Jeroen Belleman
6 Nov 24 ii   i+- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Jan Panteltje
6 Nov 24 ii   i+- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Edward Rawde
6 Nov 24 ii   i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz5john larkin
6 Nov 24 ii   i `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz4Jeroen Belleman
6 Nov 24 ii   i  `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz3john larkin
7 Nov 24 ii   i   `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz2Jeroen Belleman
7 Nov 24 ii   i    `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1john larkin
18 Nov 24 ii   `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz11Liz Tuddenham
19 Nov 24 ii    `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz10Edward Rawde
19 Nov 24 ii     `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz9Liz Tuddenham
19 Nov 24 ii      `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz8Edward Rawde
19 Nov 24 ii       `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz7Jeroen Belleman
19 Nov 24 ii        +- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Edward Rawde
19 Nov 24 ii        `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz5Joe Gwinn
19 Nov 24 ii         `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz4john larkin
19 Nov 24 ii          `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz3Joe Gwinn
20 Nov 24 ii           `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz2Jan Panteltje
20 Nov 24 ii            `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Joe Gwinn
4 Nov 24 i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz38Edward Rawde
5 Nov 24 i `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz37Jan Panteltje
5 Nov 24 i  `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz36Edward Rawde
6 Nov 24 i   +- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Bill Sloman
6 Nov 24 i   `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz34Jan Panteltje
6 Nov 24 i    +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz20Bill Sloman
6 Nov 24 i    i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz19Jan Panteltje
6 Nov 24 i    i +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz2Liz Tuddenham
6 Nov 24 i    i i`- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Jan Panteltje
6 Nov 24 i    i `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz16Bill Sloman
6 Nov 24 i    i  `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz15Liz Tuddenham
6 Nov 24 i    i   +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz13Bill Sloman
6 Nov 24 i    i   i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz12Liz Tuddenham
7 Nov 24 i    i   i `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz11Jan Panteltje
7 Nov 24 i    i   i  `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz10Liz Tuddenham
7 Nov 24 i    i   i   `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz9Jan Panteltje
8 Nov 24 i    i   i    `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]8Liz Tuddenham
8 Nov 24 i    i   i     +- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]1Jan Panteltje
8 Nov 24 i    i   i     +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]2Cursitor Doom
8 Nov 24 i    i   i     i`- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]1Liz Tuddenham
8 Nov 24 i    i   i     `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]4ehsjr
9 Nov 24 i    i   i      `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]3Liz Tuddenham
9 Nov 24 i    i   i       `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]2Jan Panteltje
9 Nov 24 i    i   i        `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz [OT]1Liz Tuddenham
6 Nov 24 i    i   `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1john larkin
6 Nov 24 i    `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz13Edward Rawde
6 Nov 24 i     +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz8john larkin
7 Nov 24 i     i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz7Liz Tuddenham
7 Nov 24 i     i +* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz3Jeroen Belleman
7 Nov 24 i     i i`* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz2Liz Tuddenham
7 Nov 24 i     i i `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Jeroen Belleman
7 Nov 24 i     i `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz3john larkin
7 Nov 24 i     i  +- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Bill Sloman
7 Nov 24 i     i  `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1john larkin
7 Nov 24 i     `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz4Jan Panteltje
7 Nov 24 i      +- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Edward Rawde
7 Nov 24 i      `* Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz2john larkin
7 Nov 24 i       `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Jan Panteltje
21 Nov 24 `- Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz1Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal