Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 09. Nov 2024, 09:39:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <vgn740$185g$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vgn4gm$3lcor$1@dont-email.me...
On 9/11/2024 7:43 am, Edward Rawde wrote:
This is the simplest circuit I can come up with.
Harmonics are more than 80dB down in simulation.
FFT the last 30 seconds.
There is only one harmonic stopping me claiming 90dB but the exact FFT result can depend
on exactly how much output is selected for the FFT. You may see different results.
>
If a prototype is ever built, attention to the type and quality of the capacitors used will be needed.
Electrolytics are not intended. Put C1 and C2 near U1 supply pins.
>
If electrolytics are not intended, why are most of the capacitors rated at 10V?

Yes

>
When I cut and pasted the file the capacitors were mostly labelled as 10?, 1? and - in the case of the wein bridge capacitors
0.015?
>

When I cut and pasted the file into notepad++ and removed line 391 and subsequent lines (or fixed wraps) and under encoding
converted to ANSI everything worked fine.

The 15nF capacitors are rated at 16V - the polypropylene parts you can actually buy that are offered with a +/-1% tolerance are
63V and 250V parts

You'd have to take that up with the LTSpice parts library.

>
I presume you intended u or the Greek mu symbol, and after I'd done that substitution the simulation did work, if not well.

No substitution is required if you convert to ANSI in notepad++

>
The feedback loop doesn't settle well, and I suspect that I know why. R4 should probably be in series with C3, not in parallel.
More later.
>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 



Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Nov 24 * Final final 1kHz oscillator59Edward Rawde
9 Nov 24 +* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator16Bill Sloman
9 Nov 24 i+* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator14Edward Rawde
9 Nov 24 ii`* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator13Bill Sloman
9 Nov 24 ii +- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Edward Rawde
10 Nov 24 ii `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator11Edward Rawde
10 Nov 24 ii  `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator10Cursitor Doom
10 Nov 24 ii   +- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Edward Rawde
10 Nov 24 ii   `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator8Edward Rawde
10 Nov 24 ii    `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator7Cursitor Doom
10 Nov 24 ii     `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator6Cursitor Doom
10 Nov 24 ii      `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator5Cursitor Doom
11 Nov 24 ii       `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator4Edward Rawde
11 Nov 24 ii        +* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator2Edward Rawde
11 Nov 24 ii        i`- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Cursitor Doom
11 Nov 24 ii        `- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Joe Gwinn
9 Nov 24 i`- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Cursitor Doom
14 Nov 24 `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator42JM
14 Nov 24  +- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1JM
14 Nov 24  `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator40Edward Rawde
15 Nov 24   +* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator6Bill Sloman
15 Nov 24   i+* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator2Edward Rawde
15 Nov 24   ii`- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
16 Nov 24   i+- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
16 Nov 24   i`* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator2Bill Sloman
18 Nov 24   i `- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Edward Rawde
17 Nov 24   `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator33JM
18 Nov 24    +* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator29Edward Rawde
19 Nov 24    i+- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
19 Nov 24    i`* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator27Bill Sloman
20 Nov 24    i `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator26Edward Rawde
20 Nov 24    i  +* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator21Bill Sloman
20 Nov 24    i  i`* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator20Bill Sloman
20 Nov 24    i  i `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator19Edward Rawde
20 Nov 24    i  i  `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator18Bill Sloman
22 Nov 24    i  i   `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator17Bill Sloman
22 Nov 24    i  i    `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator16Edward Rawde
23 Nov 24    i  i     +* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator14Bill Sloman
23 Nov 24    i  i     i+* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator12Edward Rawde
23 Nov 24    i  i     ii`* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator11Bill Sloman
23 Nov 24    i  i     ii `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator10Edward Rawde
24 Nov 24    i  i     ii  +- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1ehsjr
24 Nov 24    i  i     ii  `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator8Bill Sloman
24 Nov 24    i  i     ii   `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator7Edward Rawde
25 Nov 24    i  i     ii    `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator6Bill Sloman
26 Nov 24    i  i     ii     `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator5Bill Sloman
27 Nov 24    i  i     ii      +- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Edward Rawde
27 Nov 24    i  i     ii      `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator3JM
27 Nov 24    i  i     ii       `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator2Bill Sloman
28 Nov 24    i  i     ii        `- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Edward Rawde
23 Nov 24    i  i     i`- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Edward Rawde
23 Nov 24    i  i     `- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
20 Nov 24    i  `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator4JM
20 Nov 24    i   +- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1JM
21 Nov 24    i   `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator2Edward Rawde
21 Nov 24    i    `- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1Edward Rawde
20 Nov 24    `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator3john larkin
20 Nov 24     `* Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator2Phil Hobbs
27 Nov 24      `- Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator1John R Walliker

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal