Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma

On a sunny day (Sun, 1 Dec 2024 14:13:55 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vigk9v$22pt7$3@dont-email.me>:

On 1/12/2024 12:45 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Sun, 1 Dec 2024 00:12:31 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vif30a$1o4ji$1@dont-email.me>:
 

On 30/11/2024 10:11 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Nov 2024 21:02:25 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vienrs$1l2a8$1@dont-email.me>:
>

On 30/11/2024 5:37 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Nov 2024 14:12:42 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vidvrl$1d62d$1@dont-email.me>:

On 30/11/2024 2:27 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Nov 2024 01:15:15 +1100) it happened Bill Slowman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vici9s$13umg$1@dont-email.me>:
>

On 30/11/2024 12:00 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:

>
<snip>
>

Well, we have global warming in case humans fail.

>
It's anthropogenic global warming. If we stop digging up fossil carbon
and burning it, that extra warmth will go away eventually - but it is
likely to take a few centuries.
>

Or we can dig deep enough into the ground for some heat.
But the question remains if you CAN make break even - get positive energy out
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion
endless babble about Albert E...
>
But, my solar panels work great!

>
But they rely on that big fusion reactor hanging there in the middle of
the solar system. It's been there for about 4.5 billion years. Nobody
realised that it was nuclear fusion reactor until quite recently, and
the message still doesn't seem to have got through to you.

 
Oh well, and the sun will burn up eventually or so I'v read.
Not so much is known about the inner nuclear workings of the sun.

>
Quite a lot is known, if not by you.
>

Is the fusion part caused by enormous pressures from the rest of the sun?

>
It's temperature rather than  pressure that makes the difference.
>

It does not have to be break even or positive at all.

>
Of course it has to. Gravitational compression created the pressure and
the heat that eventually started the nuclear reaction. It takes about
100,000 years for a photon from the reacting core of the sum to make it
out to emerge as sunlight.
>

I will not even mention Le Sage (oops) and possible other theories
dark matter, what not.

>
That's a relief. You mostly ventilate your idiocies non-stop.

 
Would be nice if we could look ahead a few thousand years to see the theories then.

>
Not really. We wouldn't understand them.
>

If humanity still exists, Dinos ?

>
Most species last about 10 million years. We might completely wreck the
earth and kill ourselves off in the process, but we've survived several
ice-age to interglacial transitions.
>

We are just like ants, a few neurons wanting - looking for - a theory of everything.

>
Just a bit bigger than ants, with rather more technology.
>

And yet, everything is connected...

>
Another one of your mindless assertions.
>

There is nothing you can know that is not known:
  https://www.thebeatles.com/all-you-need-love-0

>
There is plenty you can "know" that isn't known to other people.
>
You produce more nonsense than most, and most of what you think you know
strikes other people as largely unoriginal nonsense.
>
"It does not have to be break even or positive at all."

Well since you have not designed build and published even a picture of something as simple as a flashlight here
logic suggest possible jealousy or 'grootheidswaanzin'

But then so did einstein, he never did an experiment in his life and his only design was a bad frigde.
Him being youwish made him their hero, god almost, as he wrote that letter to suggest committing genocide on Japanese civilians with nukes.
His squared lightbulb masses are the biggest obstacle to science advancing as are glowball worming witch hunts.

Look at fusion like a spring
A srping can be compressed and drive a clock or a toy car
But it never will power anything by itself.
There will always be a net loss between comprssion and using it to do something.
Table top will confirm that (Farnsworth Fusor).
ITER has confirmed that, but misguided politicians keep falling for the einstein brainwashed,
pooring in ever more money for no result at all.. EVER.
ITER will always ask for bigger and more.
Sure some suppliers of magnets and what not now make a living from your tax money there..
At the same time US agents like Germany's murkel killed the real power generating nuclear plants.

Humming species... decline, dark ages repeating itself, dummies produced by the millions
zero understanding mamaticians doing a divide by zero, multiple uni-verses (do they sing there).

What a         world
I liked this piece of music:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA9WCZP4dTQ