Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On 12/13/2024 8:57 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:The choices in my day at Melbourne University in Australia were Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Physical Chemistry. Win Hill started a Ph.D. in Chemical Physics at MIT at much the same time. It's more a theological distinction than anything with any real world significance, but John Larkin never paid much attention to his undergraduate chemistry lectures. I completed a master's degree in Inorganic Chemistry on the way to getting my Ph.D.On 14/12/2024 4:23 am, john larkin wrote:I guess not many universities offer a Ph.D. in non-physical chemistry these days. :(On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 23:57:54 -0700, Don Y>
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
>At a fixed time and temperature, is it safe to model a battery as a>
fixed voltage source behind a series resistance? Possibly, additionally,
a parallel RC to cover transients?
>
In particular, does the model need to change based on whether the
battery is being charged or discharged? (i.e., to estimate that
series resistance)
I've wondered about electro-chemical time lags, ions drifting around
in liquids, as in what would the Spice model of some battery be?
That's what Warburg impedances are about.
>And>
on a slower time scale, the morphology of a battery changes with time.
Nearly discharged batteries sure go Hi-Z.
>
What we need here is a good physical chemistry guy.
I've got a Ph.D. in physical chemistry, but batteries are electrochemistry - I know a guy who has just completed a Ph.D. with a thesis on a particular lithium ion battery chemistry. It's a specialised subject.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.