Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 18. Dec 2024, 12:44:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjucjg$29cj0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 18/12/2024 5:16 pm, bitrex wrote:
On 12/17/2024 10:49 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
I've been playing with the circuit, and have got rid of one op amp, which made the simulation run much faster, but didn't help the distortion performance.
>
Swapping the LT1115 for the LME49710 speeded up the simulation a bit more, but didn't make any difference to the distortion either. A few of the ferrite beads have gone too.
 It seems to like to squeg for me (LTSpice 17.0.37)
 <https://imgur.com/a/6uqsw1H>
I've seen that happen, but only when the one of the connections has come unstuck. The route through WordPad to here and on to your own .asc file can screw up the schematic.
The amplitude control feedback loop - through the four-pole maximally flat low pass filter around U6 and U7 through the integrator around U5 does include the 68k resistor at R10 to provide enough phase lead to keep it stable.
I plot V(out) and the control voltage V(fet-gate), and V(fet-gate) starts off at 0V and drops below -3.862V within 5msec after which V(out) starts building up. The amplitude control system system kicks in at 20msec and by 41msec has got V(fet-gate) back to -3.862V where V(out) starts to fall back, and eventually undershoots, but the ringing is damped, and the system is stable after about 0.5 sec.
Post the .asc file you ran.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Dec04:49 * The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version15Bill Sloman
18 Dec07:16 +* Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version3bitrex
18 Dec12:44 i`* Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version2Bill Sloman
18 Dec17:18 i `- Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version1Bill Sloman
18 Dec20:00 `* Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version11Edward Rawde
19 Dec03:38  `* Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version10Bill Sloman
19 Dec04:10   `* Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version9Edward Rawde
19 Dec07:29    `* Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version8Bill Sloman
19 Dec17:55     +* Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version6john larkin
19 Dec18:22     i+* Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version4Edward Rawde
19 Dec23:34     ii+* Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version2john larkin
20 Dec05:01     iii`- Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version1Bill Sloman
20 Dec04:55     ii`- Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version1Bill Sloman
20 Dec04:40     i`- Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version1Bill Sloman
20 Dec03:09     `- Re: The not-all-that-low distortion sine wave oscillator in a faster simulating version1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal