Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 04. Jan 2025, 05:25:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlad8g$aml4$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/01/2025 5:52 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jan 2025 19:02:23 -0800, john larkin wrote:
 
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 19:24:31 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
>
On 02-Jan-25 2:00 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Is what 'they' said at the outset. Now it emerges he had an ISIS flag
in his truck at the time! No wonder fewer and fewer people are
trusting the legacy media. This is why it's so important to have
citizen journalists mobilised and fact-checking what's really going on
when these incidents occur. I don't suppose the rather embarrassing
presence of the flag would have been revealed otherwise.
>
For years the conspiracy theorists were telling us that governments
wereat
using the threat of terrorism to take away our freedoms.
>
Now the conspiracy theory is that governments are hiding the existence
of terrorism from us.
>
So which is it?
>
Sylvia.
>
There is no single Ministey Of Conspiracy Theory. There's diversity in
the lunatic fringe world.
 Obama's birth certificate springs to mind here. There are equal numbers of
people calling it out as a fake as there are calling these same people
conspiracy nuts and lunatics.
It's a lunatic fringe.
  To this day, there are *still* people who
refuse to accept that this document is 100% a crude and obvious forgery.
Presumably they share Cursitor Doom's enthusiasm for obviously fatuous nonsense.

Do they seriously deluded enough to believe that its genuine or are they
just intentionally lying?
Does it matter?

It just beggars belief that someone (Obama) in that position can commit a
crime like that and not even be investigated - officially - over it.
It's easier to believe that a lying nutcase like Trump can latch onto the nonsense as part of deceptive rhetoric.
He gave up on it after he got elected and had to try and look "presidential".

There's some serious corruption at work in America and AISI, it's the No.1
thing Trump needs to deal with this time, because he conspicuously failed
first time around - despite all those campaign pledges to "drain the
swamp."
Which was one more of his implausible lies.
<snip>

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jan 25 * OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"62Cursitor Doom
1 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
1 Jan 25 i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Carlos E.R.
2 Jan 25 +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"56Sylvia Else
2 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"44Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"43bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"40john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"34bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"31john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"30bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"29john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"24bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i+- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Liz Tuddenham
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"22john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"13bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"12john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"8bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7john larkin
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4bitrex
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3john larkin
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
8 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i   `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"6john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i+- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1john larkin
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Liz Tuddenham
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
3 Jan 25 ii`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
3 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7john larkin
3 Jan 25 ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"6Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"5Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii   `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii    `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
3 Jan 25 i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2john larkin
4 Jan 25 i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2john larkin
3 Jan 25  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal