Re: Curve Tracer

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Curve Tracer
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 07. Feb 2025, 13:12:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vo4tbt$3g8ne$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/02/2025 8:18 am, john larkin wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:11:58 +1100, Chris Jones
<lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> wrote:
 
On 6/02/2025 2:45 pm, Bill Sloman wrote:
On-Semi makes two monolithic duals, the NST45010 and the NST45011
>
https://www.onsemi.com/pdf/datasheet/nst45010mw6-d.pdf
https://www.onsemi.com/download/data-sheet/pdf/nst45011mw6-d.pdf
>
>
What makes you think those are monolithic? I think they are separate
chips, but measured to have similar parameters, like the BCM846BS.
>
The thermal coupling between the chips will be poor, so they will no
longer be matched if the dissipation is not the same between them. You
could cascode a current mirror to fix that, but if you are trying to
make an exponentiator (as used in analogue synth VCOs) then you are
stuffed, because you need to operate the two transistors at different
currents, that being the whole point of the circuit.
>
You will know if they are monolithic because it will have a pin called
"substrate" or a note saying one of the pins is the substrate, and there
will be a spec pointing out that the voltage between the two devices
must be kept below some lowish value.
You would know if they were monolithic if they did have a substrate pin.
The fact that they haven't got one isn't proof that they aren't monolithic. A stronger argument is that they haven't put any limits on device-to-device voltages.
My reason for thinking that they were monolithic was the 2mV worst case and the 1mVB typical difference in Vbe at 2mA.
Monolithic does seem to offer the cheapest route to get that.

They are two similar chips, not monolithic. Thermals will be awful.
Prove it.
They may be two separate close-to-identical chips. There isn't room in the package to mount them far apart, and the chip to chip thermal resistance can't be large, and has to be much smaller than the package to ambient thermal resistance, which is 328C/Watt.
Thermals won't be awful. Somebody who doesn't know about Wilson current mirrors isn't going to be a particularly reliable source of information about that kind of subject.
Interdigitated monolithic is hard to beat for thermal matching but side-by-side devices on the same subtrate aren't going to be any better than  devices on separate substrates if the substrates are mounted back-to-back.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Feb 25 * Curve Tracer25Cursitor Doom
4 Feb 25 `* Re: Curve Tracer24john larkin
5 Feb 25  `* Re: Curve Tracer23Cursitor Doom
5 Feb 25   `* Re: Curve Tracer22john larkin
5 Feb 25    `* Re: Curve Tracer21Ian
5 Feb 25     `* Re: Curve Tracer20Cursitor Doom
5 Feb 25      `* Re: Curve Tracer19john larkin
5 Feb 25       +- Re: Curve Tracer1Bill Sloman
6 Feb 25       `* Re: Curve Tracer17Cursitor Doom
6 Feb 25        `* Re: Curve Tracer16john larkin
6 Feb 25         +* Re: Curve Tracer11Bill Sloman
6 Feb 25         i`* Re: Curve Tracer10john larkin
7 Feb 25         i `* Re: Curve Tracer9Bill Sloman
7 Feb 25         i  `* Re: Curve Tracer8piglet
7 Feb 25         i   +* Re: Curve Tracer6Phil Hobbs
7 Feb 25         i   i+- Re: Curve Tracer1Bill Sloman
7 Feb 25         i   i`* Re: Curve Tracer4john larkin
7 Feb 25         i   i +- Re: Curve Tracer1Phil Hobbs
8 Feb 25         i   i +- Re: Curve Tracer1Bill Sloman
8 Feb 25         i   i `- Re: Curve Tracer1Bill Sloman
7 Feb 25         i   `- Re: Curve Tracer1john larkin
6 Feb 25         +- Re: Curve Tracer1Liz Tuddenham
7 Feb 25         `* Re: Curve Tracer3Bill Sloman
8 Feb 25          `* Re: Curve Tracer2john larkin
9 Feb 25           `- Re: Curve Tracer1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal