Re: end of Intel?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: end of Intel?
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 22. Feb 2025, 02:01:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpb7lt$3l4rk$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
 
 
https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/20/intel_carveup/
 
https://siliconangle.com/2025/02/18/silver-lake-set-buy-majority-stake-intels-altera-programmable-chip-business/
 
Intel has tried so many things that failed. DRAM, bubble memory, CISC,
RISC, ARM, EUV, and now Altera.
 
All they ever did successfully was x86, basically the ancient 8008 (or
maybe 4004) architecture.
 
 

They used to be very good at making chips, till they fell on their faces at
the 10-nm node.

A generally unpleasant outfit to deal with.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs  Principal Consultant  ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics  Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Feb 25 * end of Intel?13John Larkin
22 Feb 25 +* Re: end of Intel?3Phil Hobbs
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: end of Intel?2John Larkin
22 Feb 25 i `- Re: end of Intel?1Bill Sloman
22 Feb 25 +* Re: end of Intel?7bitrex
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: end of Intel?6Don Y
22 Feb 25 i +* Re: end of Intel?3John Larkin
23 Feb 25 i i`* Re: end of Intel?2Michael Schwingen
23 Feb 25 i i `- Re: end of Intel?1Don Y
22 Feb 25 i `* Re: end of Intel?2Dennis
22 Feb 25 i  `- Re: end of Intel?1Don Y
22 Feb 25 `* Re: end of Intel?2Jeff Layman
22 Feb 25  `- Re: end of Intel?1John Larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal