Re: energy in UK

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: energy in UK
De : '''newspam''' (at) *nospam* nonad.co.uk (Martin Brown)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 21. Apr 2025, 13:29:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vu5dnk$25rdu$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 20/04/2025 18:25, Don Y wrote:
On 4/20/2025 7:27 AM, Martin Brown wrote:
E.g., the house I grew up in had two wire (neutral and hot) circuits
throughout, using BX cable.  So, none of the outlets had earth
connections available.
>
The code requirement for an earthed system goes way back in the UK. I can't
 The *system* is earthed but the outlets don't present a separate
earth conductor.  House was built in ~1956.
In the UK the only outlet that isn't earthed (and today is double isolated) is the 2pin mains shaver socket in the bathroom.
 I recall adding branch circuits in the basement "work room" that
added the third conductor (load center was located in the basement
work room so little cost to use new cable, there)
Your house hasn't been rewired since the 1950's? Hasn't the rubber insulation deteriorated almost to the point of no return by now?
Ozone seems to make it quite tacky or cracked when it becomes antique.

What happens if a drunk takes down a "power pole" feeding said village?
>
Last time it happened was the coldest day of the year and it was the milk tanker hit black ice and took down 2 poles and 30' of hedge. There is no way he was doing 30mph! Engineers had us back on by nightfall.
>
Would he have been financially responsible for the repair (though
likely not the secondary losses)?
>
His insurers would be. Having insurance to drive on public roads is a strict requirement in the UK and relatively well policed by ANPR.
 Well, *he* would be named in the lawsuit and his insurer would step in
for his "defense".
Not how it works in the UK. Advice is don't admit liability at the scene and call your insurers claims number immediately. They take care of pretty much everything after that unless there is evidence of criminality or serious injuries resulted and a police investigation.
Recent juicy one with a BMW chase in Newcastle that totalled 5 police cars in a Keystone cops style hard stop incident. They initially only wanted to tell him that his rear brake light was defective too.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g9mezn9ero
Major arterial road was closed for a couple of days while they did the measurements and scraped up all the bits. He wasn't insured and several police were injured so they will doubtless throw the book at him.

But, that's just to "buy the light pole" (a euphemism here for the act of
crashing into a utility pole, usually while intoxicated).  Would he
also be liable for losses incurred by customers of the utility?
E.g., the local restaurateur suing because he lost a freezer full of food?
Or, would it be seen as an expected risk (power outage) that the
restaurateur should have protected against?
Dunno. The power where I live is flaky enough that farms and cafes have their own emergency generators so that power outages don't catch them out. Cows still need milking mains electricity or no.
A lot of the crashes round here never officially happened since they typically take out a chunk of hedge on the exit of a tight bend. Single vehicle incidents late at night probably drunks.
--
Martin Brown

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Apr 25 * energy in UK175john larkin
13 Apr 25 +* Re: energy in UK172Bill Sloman
13 Apr 25 i+* Re: energy in UK3Liz Tuddenham
13 Apr 25 ii`* Re: energy in UK2Cursitor Doom
13 Apr 25 ii `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i`* Re: energy in UK168Martin Brown
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK18Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i i+- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
14 Apr 25 i i+* Re: energy in UK14Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: energy in UK13Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: energy in UK12Martin Brown
14 Apr 25 i ii  `* Re: energy in UK11Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i ii   `* Re: energy in UK10Jim Jackson
14 Apr 25 i ii    `* Re: energy in UK9Liz Tuddenham
15 Apr 25 i ii     `* Re: energy in UK8Martin Brown
16 Apr 25 i ii      `* Re: energy in UK7Liz Tuddenham
16 Apr 25 i ii       `* Re: energy in UK6Martin Brown
18 Apr 25 i ii        `* Re: energy in UK5Cursitor Doom
18 Apr 25 i ii         +- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
19 Apr 25 i ii         `* Re: energy in UK3Martin Brown
20 Apr 25 i ii          `* Re: energy in UK2Cursitor Doom
20 Apr 25 i ii           `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i i+- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
16 Apr 25 i i`- Re: energy in UK1Cursitor Doom
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK7john larkin
14 Apr 25 i i`* Re: energy in UK6Jeroen Belleman
14 Apr 25 i i `* Re: energy in UK5john larkin
15 Apr 25 i i  `* Re: energy in UK4Jeroen Belleman
15 Apr 25 i i   `* Re: energy in UK3john larkin
16 Apr 25 i i    `* Re: energy in UK2Jeroen Belleman
16 Apr 25 i i     `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK2Jeroen Belleman
15 Apr 25 i i`- Re: energy in UK1Martin Brown
15 Apr 25 i `* Re: energy in UK140Don Y
15 Apr 25 i  `* Re: energy in UK139Martin Brown
15 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK96Don Y
16 Apr 25 i   i`* Re: energy in UK95Martin Brown
16 Apr 25 i   i `* Re: energy in UK94Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  +* Re: energy in UK11KevinJ93
17 Apr 25 i   i  i`* Re: energy in UK10Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  i `* Re: energy in UK9KevinJ93
17 Apr 25 i   i  i  +* Re: energy in UK3Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i  i  i`* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i  i  i `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  i  `* Re: energy in UK5Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i  i   `* Re: energy in UK4KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i  i    `* Re: energy in UK3wmartin
18 Apr 25 i   i  i     `* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i  i      `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  `* Re: energy in UK82Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK76Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i`* Re: energy in UK75Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i +* Re: energy in UK39Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i`* Re: energy in UK38Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i `* Re: energy in UK37Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i  +* Re: energy in UK35Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i+* Re: energy in UK32Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii`* Re: energy in UK31Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii `* Re: energy in UK30Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  +* Re: energy in UK3Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  i`* Re: energy in UK2Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  i `- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  `* Re: energy in UK26KevinJ93
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii   `* Re: energy in UK25Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    +* Re: energy in UK20Carlos E.R.
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    i+* Re: energy in UK18Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii`* Re: energy in UK17Carlos E.R.
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii `* Re: energy in UK16Don Y
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii  `* Re: energy in UK15Carlos E.R.
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii   `* Re: energy in UK14Don Y
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    +* Re: energy in UK9Joe Gwinn
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    i+* Re: energy in UK7Don Y
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii`* Re: energy in UK6Joe Gwinn
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii `* Re: energy in UK5Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  +* Re: energy in UK2Joe Gwinn
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  i`- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  `* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii   `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    i`- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    `* Re: energy in UK4Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     +* Re: energy in UK2Liz Tuddenham
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     i`- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    i`- Re: energy in UK1KevinJ93
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    `* Re: energy in UK4KevinJ93
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii     `* Re: energy in UK3Don Y
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii      `* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii       `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
24 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i`* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
24 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i  `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
17 Apr 25 i   i   i +* Re: energy in UK3Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i`* Re: energy in UK2Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
17 Apr 25 i   i   i `* Re: energy in UK32Carlos E.R.
17 Apr 25 i   i   i  `* Re: energy in UK31Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i   `* Re: energy in UK30Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK4Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i`* Re: energy in UK3Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i `* Re: energy in UK2Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i  `- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK2john larkin
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK4Liz Tuddenham
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    `* Re: energy in UK19Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK2Theo
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i   `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
16 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK18john larkin
16 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK4Liz Tuddenham
25 Apr 25 i   `* Re: energy in UK20Martin Brown
18 Apr 25 `* Re: energy in UK2john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal