Re: Interesting inductor

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Interesting inductor
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 13. Mar 2024, 13:55:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uss7o8$v5sd$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 13/03/2024 2:17 pm, Phil Hobbs wrote:
So I'm doing a new lab amp product.
Our existing one is 500 Hz -- 20 MHz, 1.1 nV/sqrt(Hz).
 The new one is aiming to be 10 kHz -- 200 MHz, 0.25 nV/sqrt(Hz).  The spherical cows love it, so we'll see when the test boards arrive later this week.
 As part of the design, I wanted to make an emitter follower with a decent amount of inductance in series with its tail resistor, to avoid the transistor turning off on fast negative edges and causing linearity problems.
 Searching on Digikey, I found this very interesting part:
<https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/epcos-tdk-electronics/B82498F1472J000/697521>.
 4.7 uH 0805 wirewound, with a self-resonant frequency of _210 MHz_, which is several times higher than many other parts of that description.    That corresponds to an effective parallel capacitance of 0.12 pF, about that of a resistor of the same size, despite all the copper windings.
 Pretty nifty, if true.  (Parts on order.)
Anything over 1uH has a ferrite core - probably a nickel-zinc ferrite at those sorts of frequencies.
Minimising parallel capacitance is supposed to demand spacing the winding wires by their own diameter, but that doesn't show up on the drawing (and probably wouldn't even if they were doing it).
Definitely interesting.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Mar 24 * Interesting inductor16Phil Hobbs
13 Mar 24 +* Re: Interesting inductor3Phil Hobbs
13 Mar 24 i`* Re: Interesting inductor2Phil Hobbs
13 Mar 24 i `- Re: Interesting inductor1Phil Hobbs
13 Mar 24 +- Re: Interesting inductor1Bill Sloman
14 Mar 24 +* Re: Interesting inductor8Clive Arthur
14 Mar 24 i`* Re: Interesting inductor7john larkin
14 Mar 24 i +* Re: Interesting inductor5Clive Arthur
14 Mar 24 i i+- Re: Interesting inductor1Phil Hobbs
14 Mar 24 i i+- Re: Interesting inductor1John Larkin
15 Mar 24 i i`* Re: Interesting inductor2john larkin
16 Mar 24 i i `- Re: Interesting inductor1Bill Sloman
14 Mar 24 i `- Re: Interesting inductor1piglet
14 Mar 24 `* Re: Interesting inductor3Cursitor Doom
14 Mar 24  `* Re: Interesting inductor2Phil Hobbs
14 Mar 24   `- Re: Interesting inductor1Cursitor Doom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal