Sujet : Re: Memristor cross bar arrays for faster AI neural nets and math?
De : alien (at) *nospam* comet.invalid (Jan Panteltje)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 18. Mar 2024, 11:22:25
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ut94l2$1gm2b$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (Linux-5.15.32-v7l+)
On a sunny day (Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:02:33 +0100) it happened Jeroen Belleman
<
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <
ut93d2$43ac$1@dont-email.me>:
On 3/18/24 05:55, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Source:
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Summary:
A team of engineers has proven that their analog computing device, called a memristor, can complete complex, scientific
computing tasks while bypassing the limitations of digital computing.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/03/240314145325.htm
bit like our neural nets...
>
I have an issue with calling a memristor a 'computing device'. If
If you can do matrix computations with it why not?
quote from that llnk:
"When organized into a crossbar array,
such a memristive circuit does analog computing by using physical laws
in a massively parallel fashion, substantially accelerating matrix operation,
the most frequently used but very power-hungry computation in neural networks
"
If you accept that, then so are capacitors and inductors!
Well you could store analog info in CMOS too, even in capacitors.
Inductors? not so sure, not so easy for a long time?