Sujet : Re: +48 precharge
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 24. Mar 2024, 22:58:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <utq45e$j7cc$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Joe Gwinn <
joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:14:57 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
We have a board that tends to blow up.
It has a couple of isolated dc/dc converters, gate driver chips and
big mosfet full-bridges driving transformers. The gate drivers get
their inputs from an FPGA.
The probelm is that the +48 volts to the h-bridges comes up at power
turn-on, but the FPGA is configured some minutes later, after Linux
boots up. And I don't entirely trust the FPGA outputs meanwhile.
Possibly never.
After designing many complex fixes, a simple fix is to precharge the
module's +48 rail gently, and slam it on hard after everything is
verified stable.
<https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/i7mgvnad9h1itxf8p0t76/P941_942_Precharge_1.jpg?rlkey=tv3rh3kzlw40th20oes6hlhr2&raw=1>
The one-shot gets its I'M OK trigger from the FPGA, which can only
happen if the FPGA is working, I hope.
Can you require significant net charge transfer on a short period of
time from the FPGA before the one-shot will trigger?
Joe Gwinn
There are any number of ways to reject FPGA zombie behavior. The
retriggerable one-shot is pretty simple.
Another fairly simple one would be making the processor wait to receive a
specific message from the FPGA, e.g. “Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has
landed.”
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics