Re: silicone grease

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: silicone grease
De : liz (at) *nospam* poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 01. Apr 2024, 13:42:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Poppy Records
Message-ID : <1qrc8bu.tf4u1c58lkkkN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.4.6
Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

[..]
If you are prepared to de-rate accordingly then there isn't really a
problem but if you want to run them at full power then they need to be
in intimate contact with their heat sink and that means wetted by some
sort of heat transfer medium.

Designing audio amplifiers, it often worked out more economical to use
two output devices run gently, rather than a single one pushed to its
limits.  The two thermal paths between die and heatsink are effectively
in parallel and carrying half the power each, so you can run the die
cooler [preferred] or the heatsink hotter [if you really must].

You also keep the device well below its maximum current rating where the
current gain is higher and it needs less drive power.  Economies in the
drive stage and current protection may well compensate for the cost of
an extra lump of silicon and a couple of resistors.


--
~ Liz Tuddenham ~
(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Mar 24 * Re: silicone grease8Martin Brown
31 Mar 24 `* Re: silicone grease7John Larkin
31 Mar 24  +- Re: silicone grease1legg
31 Mar 24  +- Re: silicone grease1piglet
1 Apr 24  `* Re: silicone grease4Martin Brown
1 Apr 24   +- Re: silicone grease1Liz Tuddenham
1 Apr 24   `* Re: silicone grease2John Larkin
1 Apr 24    `- Re: silicone grease1Joe Gwinn

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal