Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum
De : cd (at) *nospam* notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 11. Apr 2024, 14:56:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <76nf1j9j04rknbh5kgta74nteeeht3303n@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:10:59 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>
"Cursitor Doom" <cd@notformail.com> wrote in message
news:cs4e1j5ohhb7fpcmnft14ad6pv66jtvi34@4ax.com...
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:18:21 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"Cursitor Doom" <cd@notformail.com> wrote in message
news:i52e1j9ctjqi1k1m9ej1aid2493foetnsq@4ax.com...
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:11:39 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"john larkin" <jl@650pot.com> wrote in message
news:v6sd1j1sr89ntc214dku5u5e04pks5toud@4ax.com...
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:57:55 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"Cursitor Doom" <cd@notformail.com> wrote in message
news:c6hd1jdjimga6ifo7b0kv7bqfj9750lbk3@4ax.com...
Gentlemen,
>
This is an exam question that trips up even some of the best
students.
See what you make of it!
>
Q: Is this statement correct: 'The signal level at the modem input
increased by 2dBmV going from +3dBmV to +5dBmV.'
>
Your pal, CD.
>
Changing a signal level can be thought of as multiplying the signal by
a
constant.
>
You can change something by adding, too.
>
>
I haven't looked at it in detail but a bit of playing with a search
engine
finds the question here:
https://broadbandlibrary.com/wise-and-mighty-decibel/
>
>
Jeez, when I said, "No Googling" I didn't seriously think anyone here
would be dumb enough to need to actually do so! :-D
>
I don't see any mention of any search engine in your first post.
>
I tend to agree with John Larkin on this.
>
If a student can use a meter to see that a signal which was 3 somethings
is
now 5 somethings (depending on what is being measured) then I give them a
pass.
>
So going back to the orginal question as stated, you're saying the
statement in quotes is *correct* then. Nice to have a straight answer.
>
If you mean that do I think that something increases by 2 when it goes from
3 to 5 then yes that seems reasonable to me.

I'm afraid that's not exactly the question, though.
Here's what was asked again:

Q: Is this statement correct: 'The signal level at the modem input
increased by 2dBmV going from +3dBmV to +5dBmV.'

You've already nailed your colours to the mast with your opinion that
the statement is correct. Are you happy with that or would you like to
change your mind?

I'll be posting 'the answer' in about 5 hours' time for those who have
yet to stick their heads above the parapet and might be tempted to
participate. It's been a bit deafeningly quiet so far. ;-)

>
You can also multiply it by 5/3 to get the same effect if you want. I don't
mind.
>

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Apr 24 * A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum42Cursitor Doom
10 Apr 24 +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Cursitor Doom
10 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum5john larkin
10 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Cursitor Doom
10 Apr 24 i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3john larkin
10 Apr 24 i  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i   `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum14Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum13Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 i +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum11Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum10Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum9Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum8Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i   `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum7Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i    +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1albert
11 Apr 24 i i    `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum5Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i     `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i      `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i       `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
12 Apr 24 i i        `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Bill Sloman
11 Apr 24 i `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum10Jeroen Belleman
10 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum9Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum8Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 i  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum7Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i   `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum6Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 i    +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Clive Arthur
11 Apr 24 i    i`- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 i    +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i    i`- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i    `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Cursitor Doom
12 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3Jeroen Belleman
12 Apr 24 i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
13 Apr 24 i  `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Bill Sloman
11 Apr 24 +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Bill Sloman
11 Apr 24 `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum6Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24  +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1john larkin
11 Apr 24  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24   `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24    `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24     `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Cursitor Doom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal