Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 11. Apr 2024, 21:08:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <uv9cfu$2426$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"Cursitor Doom" <cd@notformail.com> wrote in message
news:qjbg1jh7baj22i618rcafvo80rcgcm7ojn@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:33:45 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"Cursitor Doom" <cd@notformail.com> wrote in message
news:ar1g1jdn81s994gd5brslvrrlns8jrtq13@4ax.com...
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:02:50 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
Gentlemen,
>
This is an exam question that trips up even some of the best students.
See what you make of it!
>
Q: Is this statement correct: 'The signal level at the modem input
increased by 2dBmV going from +3dBmV to +5dBmV.'
>
Your pal, CD.
>
Okay, here's the answer you've been waiting for from some guy on the
internet in this record-low participation quiz. This URL takes you
directly to the relevant section to save time:
>
https://youtu.be/jOVa4xJSLiA?list=PLl-kpmJ-_T4DMeDalokqXz7u-ReHZi08p&t=1466
>
So it turns out that John, Edward and myself were all wrong and only
Jason and Jeroen were right! And the proof is right there in the
video.
>
>
>
I don't see any proof of anything in the section of the video you posted.
I didn't watch the entire video.
Maybe you should post the proof for this example in text and ask why a 30
minute video is needed if a few lines of text is enough.
DOCSIS isn't my field but I would have thought that the average cable
modem
could report whether or not it's happy with the signal levels.
The ISP/Cable company I use ripped the cable and phone lines out and put
fibre to the home into the small town I live in about a year ago.
So DOCSIS is history here.
>
>
Sorry, sarcasm doesn't come across very well at all via this medium!
John knows what I mean as we're both veterans here. I actually agree
with you. The question itself is just plain stupid if the answer
suggests that two absolute quantities added together cannot make an
absolute total.

Pompous twit might be going a bit far but that's what came to mind while I
watched a few minutes of the video.
The guy with the headphones seems embarrassed.

I did manage to find this
https://www.scte.org/standards/library/catalog/scte-270-mathematics-of-cable/
I'll add it to my collection of pdfs I've had a quick look through but never
read.



Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Apr 24 * A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum42Cursitor Doom
10 Apr 24 +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Cursitor Doom
10 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum5john larkin
10 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Cursitor Doom
10 Apr 24 i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3john larkin
10 Apr 24 i  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i   `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum14Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum13Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 i +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum11Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum10Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum9Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum8Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i   `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum7Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i    +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1albert
11 Apr 24 i i    `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum5Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i     `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i      `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i       `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
12 Apr 24 i i        `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Bill Sloman
11 Apr 24 i `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum10Jeroen Belleman
10 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum9Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum8Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 i  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum7Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i   `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum6Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 i    +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Clive Arthur
11 Apr 24 i    i`- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 i    +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i    i`- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i    `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Cursitor Doom
12 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3Jeroen Belleman
12 Apr 24 i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
13 Apr 24 i  `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Bill Sloman
11 Apr 24 +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Bill Sloman
11 Apr 24 `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum6Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24  +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1john larkin
11 Apr 24  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24   `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24    `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24     `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Cursitor Doom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal