Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum
De : cd (at) *nospam* notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 11. Apr 2024, 21:52:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <4ifg1j1uadn3opvi48vd6q3u3uok7t795g@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:08:44 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

"Cursitor Doom" <cd@notformail.com> wrote in message
news:qjbg1jh7baj22i618rcafvo80rcgcm7ojn@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:33:45 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"Cursitor Doom" <cd@notformail.com> wrote in message
news:ar1g1jdn81s994gd5brslvrrlns8jrtq13@4ax.com...
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:02:50 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
Gentlemen,
>
This is an exam question that trips up even some of the best students.
See what you make of it!
>
Q: Is this statement correct: 'The signal level at the modem input
increased by 2dBmV going from +3dBmV to +5dBmV.'
>
Your pal, CD.
>
Okay, here's the answer you've been waiting for from some guy on the
internet in this record-low participation quiz. This URL takes you
directly to the relevant section to save time:
>
https://youtu.be/jOVa4xJSLiA?list=PLl-kpmJ-_T4DMeDalokqXz7u-ReHZi08p&t=1466
>
So it turns out that John, Edward and myself were all wrong and only
Jason and Jeroen were right! And the proof is right there in the
video.
>
>
>
I don't see any proof of anything in the section of the video you posted.
I didn't watch the entire video.
Maybe you should post the proof for this example in text and ask why a 30
minute video is needed if a few lines of text is enough.
DOCSIS isn't my field but I would have thought that the average cable
modem
could report whether or not it's happy with the signal levels.
The ISP/Cable company I use ripped the cable and phone lines out and put
fibre to the home into the small town I live in about a year ago.
So DOCSIS is history here.
>
>
Sorry, sarcasm doesn't come across very well at all via this medium!
John knows what I mean as we're both veterans here. I actually agree
with you. The question itself is just plain stupid if the answer
suggests that two absolute quantities added together cannot make an
absolute total.
>
Pompous twit might be going a bit far but that's what came to mind while I
watched a few minutes of the video.
The guy with the headphones seems embarrassed.
>
I did manage to find this
https://www.scte.org/standards/library/catalog/scte-270-mathematics-of-cable/
I'll add it to my collection of pdfs I've had a quick look through but never
read.
>

The guy with the phones introduces him as a 50 year veteran of the
cable industry but doesn't set out his precise qualifications, so
perhaps he has none!
Thanks for the link. I save all such documents for off-line reading on
plane flights and such like.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Apr 24 * A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum42Cursitor Doom
10 Apr 24 +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Cursitor Doom
10 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum5john larkin
10 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Cursitor Doom
10 Apr 24 i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3john larkin
10 Apr 24 i  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i   `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum14Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum13Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 i +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum11Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum10Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum9Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum8Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i   `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum7Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i    +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1albert
11 Apr 24 i i    `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum5Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i     `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i i      `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i i       `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
12 Apr 24 i i        `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Bill Sloman
11 Apr 24 i `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Edward Rawde
10 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum10Jeroen Belleman
10 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum9Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum8Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 i  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum7Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i   `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum6Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 i    +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Clive Arthur
11 Apr 24 i    i`- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 i    +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24 i    i`- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24 i    `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Jeroen Belleman
11 Apr 24 +* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Cursitor Doom
12 Apr 24 i`* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3Jeroen Belleman
12 Apr 24 i `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Cursitor Doom
13 Apr 24 i  `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Bill Sloman
11 Apr 24 +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Bill Sloman
11 Apr 24 `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum6Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24  +- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1john larkin
11 Apr 24  `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum4Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24   `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum3Cursitor Doom
11 Apr 24    `* Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum2Edward Rawde
11 Apr 24     `- Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum1Cursitor Doom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal