Sujet : Re: lithium explosion
De : erichpwagner (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (piglet)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 14. Apr 2024, 21:38:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uvhesl$3qp12$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
John Larkin <
jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 10:10:31 -0700, KevinJ93 <kevin_es@whitedigs.com>
wrote:
On 4/13/24 9:35 AM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:14:07 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
....
And a defect sensor would have to constantly snoop every cell of a
pack. A typical Tesla might have 7000 cells.
Tesla (and every other EV manufacturer) does monitor the voltage of
every individual cell and every cell has its own fusible link in case it
becomes shorted.
kw
Tesla uses many small cell in parallel, numbers like 74. I wonder how
they could monitor the voltage of each cell.
I assume "becomes shorted" means that the battery terminals are
shorted somehow. The bigger hazard is that a cell will short
internally, and all its paralleled friends will then dump thousands of
amps into it.
Not if there was a fuse in series with each cell
-- piglet
Re: lithium explosion
Re: lithium explosion