Re: Predictive failures

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Predictive failures
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 16. Apr 2024, 02:51:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uvki1n$iqfd$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:05:40 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
 
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:41:57 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
 
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:13:02 -0700, Don Y
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
 
Is there a general rule of thumb for signalling the likelihood of
an "imminent" (for some value of "imminent") hardware failure?
 
I suspect most would involve *relative* changes that would be
suggestive of changing conditions in the components (and not
directly related to environmental influences).
 
So, perhaps, a good strategy is to just "watch" everything and
notice the sorts of changes you "typically" encounter in the hope
that something of greater magnitude would be a harbinger...
 
There is a standard approach that may work:  Measure the level and
trend of very low frequency (around a tenth of a Hertz) flicker noise.
When connections (perhaps within a package) start to fail, the flicker
level rises.  The actual frequency monitored isn't all that critical.
 
Joe Gwinn
 
Do connections "start to fail" ?
 
Yes, they do, in things like vias.  I went through a big drama where a
critical bit of radar logic circuitry would slowly go nuts. 
 
It turned out that the copper plating on the walls of the vias was
suffering from low-cycle fatigue during temperature cycling and slowly
breaking, one little crack at a time, until it went open.  If you
measured the resistance to parts per million (6.5 digit DMM), sampling
at 1 Hz, you could see the 1/f noise at 0.1 Hz rising.  It's useful to
also measure a copper line, and divide the via-chain resistance by the
no-via resistance, to correct for temperature changes.
 
The solution was to redesign the vias, mainly to increase the critical
volume of copper.  And modern SMD designs have less and less copper
volume.
 
I bet precision resistors can also be measured this way.
 
 
I don't think I've ever owned a piece of electronic equipment that
warned me of an impending failure.
 
Onset of smoke emission is a common sign.
 
 
Cars do, for some failure modes, like low oil level.
 
The industrial method for big stuff is accelerometers attached near
the bearings, and listen for excessive rotation-correlated (not
necessarily harmonic) noise.

There are a number of instruments available that look for metal particles
in the lubricating oil.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs
 
 


--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs  Principal Consultant  ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics  Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Apr 24 * Predictive failures70Don Y
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Predictive failures27Martin Rid
16 Apr 24 i`* Re: Predictive failures26Don Y
16 Apr 24 i `* Re: Predictive failures25Edward Rawde
16 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Predictive failures24Don Y
16 Apr 24 i   +* Re: Predictive failures3Edward Rawde
16 Apr 24 i   i+- Re: Predictive failures1Edward Rawde
17 Apr 24 i   i`- Re: Predictive failures1legg
16 Apr 24 i   `* Re: Predictive failures20Edward Rawde
16 Apr 24 i    `* Re: Predictive failures19Don Y
16 Apr 24 i     +* Re: Predictive failures16Edward Rawde
16 Apr 24 i     i`* Re: Predictive failures15Don Y
16 Apr 24 i     i +* Re: Predictive failures13Edward Rawde
16 Apr 24 i     i i`* Re: Predictive failures12Don Y
17 Apr 24 i     i i `* Re: Predictive failures11Edward Rawde
17 Apr 24 i     i i  `* Re: Predictive failures10Don Y
17 Apr 24 i     i i   `* Re: Predictive failures9Edward Rawde
17 Apr 24 i     i i    `* Re: Predictive failures8Don Y
17 Apr 24 i     i i     `* Re: Predictive failures7Edward Rawde
17 Apr 24 i     i i      `* Re: Predictive failures6Don Y
17 Apr 24 i     i i       `* Re: Predictive failures5Edward Rawde
17 Apr 24 i     i i        `* Re: Predictive failures4Don Y
17 Apr 24 i     i i         `* Re: Predictive failures3Edward Rawde
17 Apr 24 i     i i          `* Re: Predictive failures2Don Y
17 Apr 24 i     i i           `- Re: Predictive failures1Edward Rawde
17 Apr 24 i     i `- Re: Predictive failures1Don Y
17 Apr 24 i     `* Re: Predictive failures2Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 24 i      `- Re: Predictive failures1Don Y
15 Apr 24 +- Re: Predictive failures1john larkin
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Predictive failures11Joe Gwinn
16 Apr 24 i`* Re: Predictive failures10Joe Gwinn
16 Apr 24 i +* Re: Predictive failures7john larkin
16 Apr 24 i i`* Re: Predictive failures6Joe Gwinn
16 Apr 24 i i `* Re: Predictive failures5John Larkin
17 Apr 24 i i  +* Re: Predictive failures3Edward Rawde
17 Apr 24 i i  i`* Re: Predictive failures2John Larkin
17 Apr 24 i i  i `- Re: Predictive failures1Edward Rawde
17 Apr 24 i i  `- Re: Predictive failures1Joe Gwinn
16 Apr 24 i `* Re: Predictive failures2Phil Hobbs
16 Apr 24 i  `- Re: Predictive failures1Joe Gwinn
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Predictive failures8Edward Rawde
16 Apr 24 i`* Re: Predictive failures7Don Y
16 Apr 24 i +* Re: Predictive failures4Edward Rawde
16 Apr 24 i i+* Re: Predictive failures2Don Y
16 Apr 24 i ii`- Re: Predictive failures1Edward Rawde
16 Apr 24 i i`- Re: Predictive failures1Martin Brown
17 Apr 24 i `* Re: Predictive failures2Don Y
17 Apr 24 i  `- Re: Predictive failures1Don Y
16 Apr 24 +* Re: Predictive failures7Martin Brown
16 Apr 24 i+- Re: Predictive failures1Don Y
16 Apr 24 i`* Re: Predictive failures5Bill Sloman
16 Apr 24 i `* Re: Predictive failures4Edward Rawde
17 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Predictive failures3Edward Rawde
17 Apr 24 i   `* Re: Predictive failures2John Larkin
17 Apr 24 i    `- Re: Predictive failures1Edward Rawde
16 Apr 24 +* Re: Predictive failures8Don
16 Apr 24 i+* Re: Predictive failures3Edward Rawde
16 Apr 24 ii+- Re: Predictive failures1Don
16 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Predictive failures1Don Y
17 Apr 24 i+* Re: Predictive failures3john larkin
17 Apr 24 ii`* Re: Predictive failures2Don
17 Apr 24 ii `- Re: Predictive failures1Don
17 Apr 24 i`- Re: Predictive failures1Don Y
18 Apr 24 `* Re: Predictive failures7Buzz McCool
19 Apr 24  `* Re: Predictive failures6Don Y
19 Apr 24   +- Re: Predictive failures1Don Y
19 Apr 24   `* Re: Predictive failures4boB
19 Apr 24    `* Re: Predictive failures3Don Y
21 Apr 24     `* Re: Predictive failures2boB
21 Apr 24      `- Re: Predictive failures1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal