Sujet : Re: Predictive failures
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 17. Apr 2024, 07:51:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uvno1h$1efe9$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 4/16/2024 10:12 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:
There is no need for a manufacturer to interpose themselves in such
"remote access". Having the device register with a DDNS service
cuts out the need for the manufacturer to essentially provide THAT
service.
Someone still needs to provide DDNS.
Yes, but ALL they are providing is name resolution. They aren't
processing your data stream or "adding any value", there.
So, point your DNS at an IP that maps to the DDNS service
of your choice when the device "registers" with it!
Manufacturer can abandon a product line and your hardware STILL WORKS!
Yes, UPNP has been a thing for several generations of routers now.
but browswers have become fussier about port numbers too. also some
customers are on Carrier Grade NAT, I don't think that UPNP can traverse
that. IPV6 however can avoid the CGNAT problem.
It's an ease of use vs quality of service problem.
Predictive failures
Re: Predictive failures