Re: spread-spectrum model

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:30:45 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:14:04 -0700, John Larkin
<jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:
>

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:16:04 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
>

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:26:56 -0700, John Larkin
<jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:
>

I'm designing a switching power supply module and could reduce EMI by
going spread-spectrum on the switching frequency. The simple one below
reduces things by 20 dB. Probe the SS node and FFT.
>
The ss inside switching reg chips is no doubt more sophisticated. In
an FPGA, we could do some sort of pseudo-random thing.
>
On a multi-channel power supply, there may be some small advantage to
have a separate spread per channel. That would be easy.

>
I'd check for cross-correlation as well, so no ganging up in systems
using multiple channels in some signal path.

>
When my engineers get too fussy about stuff like that, I remind them
"it's just a power supply."

>
In my world, we have multiple parallel components (like array
sections) in the signal path powered by independent power supplies
that are required to have independent noise, to prevent correlated
gain when these parallel paths are summed, say in a radar beamformer.
>
Telling the power-supply folk that it's just a power supply is a good
way to get buried in details.
>

My intent was to keep it simple and get it done.

>

Depending on details, the problem could manifest itself as peaks or
ripples in the time domain, your beloved homeland.
>
Joe Gwinn
>

>
TI has a couple of interesting appnotes
>
<https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/slyt809>
>
<https://www.ti.com/lit/SLVAF18>
>
>
Their little TPS54302 type parts have radical looking PWM, but the
final DC is super clean. Nice trick.
>
<https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8rytjiwp4hmt2ypgk9bk4/DSC06826.JPG?rlkey=4qipduct0ptrhei07ijdxpsca&raw=1>
>
<https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/kf2kxbxih6xjbx8uv2o0d/TPS54302_spectrum.JPG?rlkey=rd3diu5nvhasfn7228m8yk665&raw=1>
>
We may get some EMI from switching rise/fall ringing too, in the
hundred-MHz ballpark. It would help to de-phase that too.

>
TI stuff is widely used in radar, but in the most capable radars the
dithering is provided by bespoke radar firmware, and not left to the
converter chip.  But those chips do work well.
>
Joe Gwinn

We've decided to use home-made half bridges in the 8-channel
programmable power module. The TI and ADI switching regs are just too
smart. We'll use the reg chips when we just want a fixed power supply.

I was thinking that we could use a DDS architecture to generate the
PWM into the switching half-bridges. We could wobble the frequency
setting to spread the spectrum.

Maybe replace some of the LSBs of the frequency-set register with a
pseudorandom pattern, a different one for each power supply channel.
Change those LSBs at some rate, 20 KHz or something, to fool an
EMI-test spectrum analyzer.

A pseudorandom pattern will average to 0.5, which affects the average
switcher frequency, but we can deal with that.

I suppose I could draw a diagram.

We'd like the fine-grain spectra to not overlap, across all 8
channels. Fun.

Given eight unipolar half-bridges, we'll allow users to use a pair as
a full bridge to drive one bipolar load, or three to drive a 3-phase
load like a torque motor. In those cases, I think we can still allow
each phase to have its own independent spread-spectrum thing. The
motors won't care.