Sujet : Re: anti-gravity?
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 21. Apr 2024, 02:11:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v01lj1$3u9a1$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
John Larkin <
jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:31:19 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
jim whitby <news@spockmail.net> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:19:30 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby wrote:
Looking for opinion of persons better educatrd than myself.
I do know how to spell... most of the time. educatded
<https://thedebrief.org/nasa-veterans-propellantless-propulsion-drive->
that-physics-says-shouldnt-work-just-produced-enough-thrust-to-defeat->
earths-gravity/>
Then it should float in mid-air, or accelerate upward. So why does it
need to be tested in space?
There’s no gravity gravy train if it gets debunked on the first day.
What’s the use of that?
I wouldnt invest if I were you.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
It's fun to look at older thedebrief miracles that, so far, haven't
happened.
I prefer to keep my briefs, thanks. ;)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs