Sujet : Re: anti-gravity?
De : jjSNIPlarkin (at) *nospam* highNONOlandtechnology.com (John Larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 21. Apr 2024, 23:06:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Highland Tech
Message-ID : <sa3b2j525nta9tje2mofeq2ddl94a6cr19@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 11:20:53 -0400, Joe Gwinn <
joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:35:27 +0100, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
>
On 21/04/2024 01:11, Phil Hobbs wrote:
John Larkin <jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:31:19 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
jim whitby <news@spockmail.net> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:19:30 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby wrote:
>
Looking for opinion of persons better educatrd than myself.
I do know how to spell... most of the time. educatded
>
>
.<https://thedebrief.org/nasa-veterans-propellantless-propulsion-drive-
that-physics-says-shouldnt-work-just-produced-enough-thrust-to-defeat-
earths-gravity/>
>
Then it should float in mid-air, or accelerate upward. So why does it
need to be tested in space?
>
Vacuum to get rid of corona.
So the failure can be blamed on the Farnsworth multipactor effect.
anti-gravity?
Re: anti-gravity?